Well no because we are talking about killing, and terminating a life is is rather different from anything else regarding a living human being.
Well in regard to the Nazis, who is doing the selecting and making all decisions for all people based on their Jewishness?
Yes I know, that is a difference. Are you trying to suggest the difference you point out trumps the difference I point out? If so, forget it, both are killing the human being.
Tough. Pro-choice abortion is offensive, both involve pre-meditated killing another human being. Actually the holocaust killed lots of people for different reasons
So you are trying to suggest the difference you point out trumps the difference I point out? If so, forget it, both are killing the human being.
Suicide is genocide, since it kills a specific group of people ( suicidal people). Palliative care is genocide, since it eases the passing of a specific group of people ( the terminally ill). Shut down all those hospices! They are just like the gas chambers, where men, women and even children are shipped off to die!
If so, forget it, both are killing the human being.
of course it is
Says the poster who cant define a woman
Please accept my apologies Eightcrackers, you do indeed
Surely they were invited when the woman made the choice to have unprotected sex.
No.
We persist because we acknowledge that personhood begins at conception. The Holocaust is an apt description of the results of abortion. What happens to all of those developing fetuses once removed from the womb...are they incinerated? thrown in the trash?
Your analogy fails. The baby doesn't crawl into the womb like into a car trunk (boot). It is invited knowingly by not preventing it to begin with. The baby cannot get into the womb of its own volition.
As I said, pregnancy is only invited when it is the goal of the sexual encounter.
I would answer all of your questions with a resounding "yes" because of all of the reasons that were given in the article. Society's definition of a human person varies and is arbitrary.
No, it is an appalling and completely inaccurate comparison. You could compare with the numbers killed in road accidents or as a result of gunshot injuries or some such, but the Holocaust doesn't work for the reason given. No individual or group is advocating or seeking the death of all unborn children. A large number of individuals are deciding that due to their individual circumstances they wish to have an abortion. Calling it a Holocaust is hyperbolic and an egregious example of Godwin's Law.
The woman is inviting pregnancy by having unprotected sex. We understand the consequences and are inviting a baby into our womb by not protecting against an unwanted pregnancy. Knowingly and willingly. We are not ignorant of where babies come from.
If I send you a piece of paper with the date and time of my wedding and tell you that I want you to be there, that is an invitation to my wedding.
I find abortions appalling because it is the death of a human person...that is the reason it can be compared to the Holocaust (not Hitler). It is not simply a matter of degree whether it is all or just the deaths of some unborn babies. It is not merely a "large number" but a very significant number of abortions yearly. If you saw all of the bodies of those 46 million babies aborted this year, would not the Holocaust come to your mind at all especially if they were all disposed of in an incinerator?