from Aramaic to Greek... nothing wrong with thatthe catholic church admits it is syncretic to greek beliefs.
Not at all. All souls will meet their Maker on Judgement Day. I'm just pointing out that one doesn't want to find out that they're damned on Judgement Day. Better to discover one's situation now while there's still time to do something about it. Then again, what can one do about it? After all, no one can work their way into heaven. Works will never save anyone. Nevertheless, it's better to be aware of God's will than willfully ignorant.maybe you don’t want souls to meet Him?
What list? What's your point?those in the list are not His saints.
And yet it is Paul who refers to the pagan pantheon when he begins teaching them. He also quotes their pagan poets who then find their way into the New Testament. Were these pagan poets inspired by God when they said these things, or did they only become officially inspired after they were written in the bible?their loyalties were for the Greek system of gods (=satanic entities), disguised as christianity,
Exactly like all Christians who quote pagan poets quoted in the New Testament.exactly like the current pope.
You're conflating the structure or container with the contents. This is effectively no different than becoming legalistic. Your insistence on retaining dead forms, customs, traditions etc. doesn't allow for the gospel to expand beyond your own understanding. If we're going to go down that road, we might as well insist on circumcision, Sabbath observance, etc.example ‘saint’ augustine… his texts explicitly equate God with platonic forms and aristotelian substance.
no i was referring to the syncretism of belief catholicism has.from Aramaic to Greek... nothing wrong with that
oh I'm not. actually Augustine explicitly states that the forms are God in his text Of Free Choice of the Will.You're conflating the structure or container with the contents. This is effectively no different than becoming legalistic. Your insistence on retaining dead forms, customs, traditions etc. doesn't allow for the gospel to expand beyond your own understanding. If we're going to go down that road, we might as well insist on circumcision, Sabbath observance, etc.
The post began with an OP. It contained the list. As I have clarified already.Not at all. All souls will meet their Maker on Judgement Day. I'm just pointing out that one doesn't want to find out that they're damned on Judgement Day. Better to discover one's situation now while there's still time to do something about it. Then again, what can one do about it? After all, no one can work their way into heaven. Works will never save anyone. Nevertheless, it's better to be aware of God's will than willfully ignorant.
What list? What's your point?
My bad. Augustine is seriously confused.oh I'm not. actually Augustine explicitly states that the forms are God in his text Of Free Choice of the Will.
The only thing that is clear here is that you seem to think you're capable of judging the living and the dead.The post began with an OP. It contained the list. As I have clarified already.
Yes he isMy bad. Augustine is seriously confused.
Nope - BUT God promises that if anybody lacks WISDOM, let him ASK - singlemindedly, and wisdom will be given plentifully.Why not? Are our personal, fallible, interpretations of scripture any better than the Catholic Church?
And yet it is Paul who refers to the pagan pantheon when he begins teaching them. He also quotes their pagan poets who then find their way into the New Testament. Were these pagan poets inspired by God when they said these things, or did they only become officially inspired after they were written in the bible?
What could be easier than professing some Christian teachings, and being told you're saved?
so now we have established that your personal interpretations aren't any better than the CC.Nope
Eph 3:10 so that the manifold WISDOM of God might now be made known THROUGH the CHURCH to the principalities and authorities in the heavens.BUT God promises that if anybody lacks WISDOM, let him ASK - singlemindedly, and wisdom will be given plentifully.
No doubt about it. That's not the point. The point is were they inspired or not?When he quoted the pagan poets he was speaking to those who believed these poets were inspired.
And when it finds its way into the New Testament? You still feel this is the case when Paul quotes them?Even someone who is not inspired by God can sometimes say something that is true about him.
So were these pagan poets inspired or not? Does their poetry or philosophy become inspired only when it finds its way into the bible?Paul used this to help his hearers to come to a fuller knowledge of the truth.
They are Christians. That's what it means to profess one's faith.Unfortunately this is what often happens. Someone makes a profession of faith and is told that he is now a Christian.
No doubt about it. The critical thing to note here is the distinction between a profession of faith versus a confession of faith. The former is what one is taught to believe while the latter is what one has actually seen which is why they are referred to as a "witness".Such a person is unlikely to repent of his sins because he doesn't believe he needs to repent.
Except, of course that "THE CHURCH" doesn't apply to the "Roman Catholic Religious System" (or any othe visible Church Corporation) it's speaking of the Church of Jesus Christ as presented in the Bible.so now we have established that your personal interpretations aren't any better than the CC.
Eph 3:10 so that the manifold WISDOM of God might now be made known THROUGH the CHURCH to the principalities and authorities in the heavens.
The Church gave us the Bible, not the other way around.Except, of course that "THE CHURCH" doesn't apply to the "Roman Catholic Religious System" (or any othe visible Church Corporation) it's speaking of the Church of Jesus Christ as presented in the Bible.
The Holy Spirit gave us the Bible. the "Church" only published it. MOST of it was written before the "Church" even existed.The Church gave us the Bible, not the other way around.