Hereticks are lost and unregnerated. I agree that there are lots of hereticks that tout a kjvo position. I have encountered many of them over the last several years while defending The King James Bible 1611. Thank you for sharing what you have here. While I am not fully aware of the role of William Laud, I am aware that some 90 years after God gave us The King James Bible, there was a tare (Freemason) that usurp position as Archbishop of Cantebury. I have documented proof of that somewhere in my files. The Freemasons are Jezebels servants, and they have usurped many positions within our Christian Denominations to bring in damnable heresies.
The CofE seems to have had a very lassez faire attitude to freemasonry, at least In the 20th century. It seems that Freemasonry may have begun with the Knights Templars, who emigrated to Scotland, but also to England. King James VI, in whose name the KJV was created, may well have been one. Sir Francis Bacon who was an editor of the King James version of the Bible was perhaps also a Freemason who left masonic marks on the first edition (so I have read).
The First Freemason's Grand Lodge was only founded in London in 1717. After a quick google search, I can't find any record of other freemasons as Archbishops of Canterbury so I would be interested to know whom you allude to. Freemasonry seems to have especially taken off in a big way in the 18th century, and is largely commensurate with the reign of the KJV on both sides of the Atlantic.
In the early 1950s, both King George VI (the Head of the Church of England) and his compatriot Geoffrey Fisher (Archbishop of Canterbury) were Freemasons. Further, "while the Roman Catholic Church has made unequivocal statements against Freemasonry, the Church of England has consistently refrained from doing so and it remains acceptable for Anglican clergy to hold Masonic membership. However, the personal views of the leadership of the Church of England may have changed over the past 50 years. In the early 1950s, Archbishop Geoffrey Fisher was a Freemason. In 2002, the incoming Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, was reported in The Independent (15 November) and in The Guardian (16 November) to have reservations about Freemasonry." T. ap Sioˆn, L. J. Francis & C. Windsor, "How Anglican Clergy perceive Freemasonry."
Yet I'm none too clear as to any tangible connection between freemasonry and the KJV. I opine, without knowing much about it, that it is very likely that Freemasonry is not compatible with Christianity, as supervening the rule of faith and compromising personal allegiance to Christ, and thus would be incompatible with holding any kind of church office (the CofE is to be deprecated in this respect).
Yet to make out that the only heretics are "freemasons" is nonsense, and to make out that a naive rank-and-file Freemason is akin to a fully-fledged devil-worshipper is also nonsense. However like you I do have deep reservations about Freemasonry, as being an entry into the occult world, and as a secret society protecting morally wicked and powerful individuals from exposure. Yet it seems that you may be making unsubstantiable conspiratorial (dis)connections between the KJV and Freemasonry, which are in substance completely unrelated topics. I would be interested in knowing your rationale for relating them.
I stand by what I say and it is by God's grace that I can PROVE it.