Alex Jones lays it out...plain and clear.

[Whateverman]

See if you can find the video! He is so angry in it. LOL!

It's in the John Oliver clip I've posted here, near the beginning.

Heed the warning, though, if you're easily offended by language etc...

 

[Fenuay]

It's in the John Oliver clip I've posted here, near the beginning.

Heed the warning, though, if you're easily offended by language etc...

I'm not! And thanks for sharing it!!

 

[inertia]

Alex Jones lays it out...plain and clear.

You can see it here on the Brighteon un-censored platform.

Alex does drop the F-Bomb...so if that does bother you...don't watch. What is happening is exposed.

Anti-vaxxers, those who understand the vote was stolen...WILL, not maybe, but WILL be labeled as terrorist by your government.
False flags coming.
Due to mask...babies have lower IQ's.
More 3 days after the jab deaths than you think.
Lockdown coming.
Supply line interruptions and much more.
Spike shedding to your children.
Stolen election

If you're anti Alex Jones info Wars...I suggest you watch it. Hear and watch what your opposition is saying. Understand what's coming next.
If you love your country...Alex sums it up nicely.

Thank you Matt Slick for allowing your CARM forum to expose the Satanic lies being fed to the population.

Yes, Alex Jones has a message. Have you heard this famous conservative voice shown below?

He didn't feel the need to employ common street language in order to propagate - understanding.

---

 

[Bonnie]

Yes, Alex Jones has a message. Have you heard this famous conservative voice shown below?

He didn't feel the need to employ common street language in order to propagate - understanding.

---

I remember reading something by either Ann Landers or Dear Abby, back in one of their columns or books, about a woman who wanted to know why some people find it necessary to have every other word that comes out of their mouth be a swear word (note, not just once in a great while under stress), but nearly every other sentence is laced with a bad word. One of these columnists wrote something like this: "People who habitually use bad language do so because they are too mentally bankrupt to think of anything better to say."

I never forgot that.

I listened to the first minute of the video...at least 4 "F bombs" in that time period. I had to get off since I find that very offensive and intolerable to listen to. IF he can ONLY make his point by constantly using foul language, then what does that say about his "points"?

 

[Bonnie]

They cite crap like Breitbart and Infowars as serious because they know it will annoy the people who anger them the most.

Interesting idea. You may be correct.

 

[inertia]

I remember reading something by either Ann Landers or Dear Abby, back in one of their columns or books, about a woman who wants to know why some people find it necessary to have every other word that comes out of their mouth be a swear word (note, not just once in a great while under stress), but nearly every other sentence is laced with a bad word. One of these ladies wrote something like this: "People who habitually use bad language do so because they are too mentally bankrupt to think of anything better to say."

I never forgot that.

I remember trying to construct whole sentences using four-letter words.

It wasn't very effective. Those words coupled with veins bulging on the head, waving hands, and showing those angry eyes are temporary bursts of emotion at best. One can find trouble quickly using this tactic in a variety of situations.

On the other hand, Billy Graham's words resonate with wisdom.

---

 

[CrowCross]

Once again, your source is a well-known crank. He's a conspiracy-theorist nutbag whose been running his ignorant mouth for years. But once again, you'll defend him because he tells you what you WANT to hear.

Do you actually have an example.....or are you simply running your mouth again?

Just for once I would love to see you respond with an actual amswer rather than your typical stale ad-homs.

 

[vibise]

I remember reading something by either Ann Landers or Dear Abby, back in one of their columns or books, about a woman who wants to know why some people find it necessary to have every other word that comes out of their mouth be a swear word (note, not just once in a great while under stress), but nearly every other sentence is laced with a bad word. One of these ladies wrote something like this: "People who habitually use bad language do so because they are too mentally bankrupt to think of anything better to say."

I never forgot that.

I listened to the first minute of the video...at least 4 "F bombs" in that time period. I had to get off since I find that very offensive. IF he can ONLY make his point by constantly using foul language, then what does that say about his "points"?

I agree with what you said. I don't get why people need to use such language when they can make their points without it. Such language is offensive to me and makes me think less of the people who use it. Does that make me a conservative?

 

[CrowCross]

If those cited people suddenly became darlings of the left, I'd bet a weekly paycheck that these believers would abandon their chosen media authorities. If Alex Jones started working for the Biden administration and parroting the Dem party message, you'd see him lose a massive amount of viewers.

They believe him because he annoys the people who annoy them (ie. educated, intelligent, reasonable people)

ps. in my humble opinion, of course

Well DUH....But I doubt he'll become a darling on the left.

 

[vibise]

Do you actually have an example.....or are you simply running your mouth again?

Just for once I would love to see you respond with an actual amswer rather than your typical stale ad-homs.

His own lawyer, in court, described him as a performance artist playing a role, who should not therefore be held responsible for the things he says.

You have yet to respond to this info after 4 pages in this thread.

Do you really think Jones was justified in claiming that the Sandy Hook killings were faked, inducing people to threaten the grieving parents? And then refuse to back down? How is that not evil?

 

[Fenuay]

I agree with what you said. I don't get why people need to use such language when they can make their points without it. Such language is offensive to me and makes me think less of the people who use it. Does that make me a conservative?

Nope! LOL! It makes you an eloquent person who doesn't need to swear because you have enough information that you don't need to fill in the gaps with profanity!

 

[CrowCross]

I remember reading something by either Ann Landers or Dear Abby, back in one of their columns or books, about a woman who wants to know why some people find it necessary to have every other word that comes out of their mouth be a swear word (note, not just once in a great while under stress), but nearly every other sentence is laced with a bad word. One of these ladies wrote something like this: "People who habitually use bad language do so because they are too mentally bankrupt to think of anything better to say."

I never forgot that.

I listened to the first minute of the video...at least 4 "F bombs" in that time period. I had to get off since I find that very offensive. IF he can ONLY make his point by constantly using foul language, then what does that say about his "points"?

I think the language was a simple reflection of the feeling he had.

Dos he constantly use foul language? I don't think so. I suppose he got mad at the demonic things that are happening to the children.

 

[CrowCross]

Interesting idea. You may be correct.

Just what in the Alex Jones message was wrong?

WHY HAS NO ONE ADDRESSED THAT? I would say it's because Alex is right and the left that post on CARM can't refute it.

SO THEY ATTACK A PERSONS CHARACTER.

 

[vibise]

Just what in the Alex Jones message was wrong?

WHY HAS NO ONE ADDRESSED THAT? I would say it's because Alex is right and the left that post on CARM can't refute it.

SO THEY ATTACK A PERSONS CHARACTER.

His own lawyer said, under oath, he is a performance artist whose claims should not be taken seriously.

If his own lawyer does not believe him, why should anyone else?

And given the lies and outrageously false accusations he has made in the past, why again should he be trusted on this?

 

[Faithoverbelief]

Just what in the Alex Jones message was wrong?

WHY HAS NO ONE ADDRESSED THAT? I would say it's because Alex is right and the left that post on CARM can't refute it.

SO THEY ATTACK A PERSONS CHARACTER.

I've already addressed it.

 

[rossum]

Just what in the Alex Jones message was wrong?

How about a greatly increased incidence of homosexuality in frogs due to chemicals. Where is the data of increased homosexuality in frogs? Where are samples of these chemicals? Where is the analysis of these chemicals?

What is wrong is the complete lack of support for his claims. IIRC he is currently losing (or has already lost?) a long legal battle about his claims over Sandy Hook.

If you believe what he says, without independent confirmation, then I have this bridge I can sell you.

 

[CrowCross]

His own lawyer said, under oath, he is a performance artist whose claims should not be taken seriously.

If his own lawyer does not believe him, why should anyone else?

And given the lies and outrageously false accusations he has made in the past, why again should he be trusted on this?

More here-say.

 

[Fenuay]

Just what in the Alex Jones message was wrong?

WHY HAS NO ONE ADDRESSED THAT? I would say it's because Alex is right and the left that post on CARM can't refute it.

SO THEY ATTACK A PERSONS CHARACTER.

Does anyone really think the frogs are turning gay? I mean that is the most ridiculous comment. Perhaps the frogs would have mutations but gay frogs??? LOL!

 

[Whateverman]

More here-say hearsay.

FTFY

For the record, almost everything you post is hearsay.

 

[CrowCross]

How about a greatly increased incidence of homosexuality in frogs due to chemicals. Where is the data of increased homosexuality in frogs? Where are samples of these chemicals? Where is the analysis of these chemicals?

What is wrong is the complete lack of support for his claims. IIRC he is currently losing (or has already lost?) a long legal battle about his claims over Sandy Hook.

If you believe what he says, without independent confirmation, then I have this bridge I can sell you.

I have no idea as to wether or not Sandy Hook was a red flag event. I've never listen to or investigated the accusations. I don't even know if Alex Jones has said what you say he has said about Sandy hook. All I have heard is claims.

Red flag events do happen. I've talked to people who were at the capitol on 1/6....and they said they witnessed groups such as Antifa or Antifa like stirring up hostility at the Capital. That I know as fact.

So, what's the future? A second lockdown will be announced soon. This will cause Americans...left and right...to take to the streets like they are doing in other countries. That's when the red flag event will be realized. Then what happens?

The Goal is Rev 13. Read it and ask what technology will be required to pull off that event....then ask if we currently have that technology. Currently we see the jab passports as becoming a reality. The jab vaccine for the most part is a photo-type.
Once the restrainer is removed then all hell will literally come to fruition.