Whateverman
Well-known member
It's in the John Oliver clip I've posted here, near the beginning.See if you can find the video! He is so angry in it. LOL!
Heed the warning, though, if you're easily offended by language etc...
It's in the John Oliver clip I've posted here, near the beginning.See if you can find the video! He is so angry in it. LOL!
I'm not! And thanks for sharing it!!It's in the John Oliver clip I've posted here, near the beginning.
Heed the warning, though, if you're easily offended by language etc...
Alex Jones lays it out...plain and clear.
You can see it here on the Brighteon un-censored platform.
Alex does drop the F-Bomb...so if that does bother you...don't watch. What is happening is exposed.
Anti-vaxxers, those who understand the vote was stolen...WILL, not maybe, but WILL be labeled as terrorist by your government.
False flags coming.
Due to mask...babies have lower IQ's.
More 3 days after the jab deaths than you think.
Lockdown coming.
Supply line interruptions and much more.
Spike shedding to your children.
Stolen election
If you're anti Alex Jones info Wars...I suggest you watch it. Hear and watch what your opposition is saying. Understand what's coming next.
If you love your country...Alex sums it up nicely.
Thank you Matt Slick for allowing your CARM forum to expose the Satanic lies being fed to the population.
I remember reading something by either Ann Landers or Dear Abby, back in one of their columns or books, about a woman who wanted to know why some people find it necessary to have every other word that comes out of their mouth be a swear word (note, not just once in a great while under stress), but nearly every other sentence is laced with a bad word. One of these columnists wrote something like this: "People who habitually use bad language do so because they are too mentally bankrupt to think of anything better to say."Yes, Alex Jones has a message. Have you heard this famous conservative voice shown below?
He didn't feel the need to employ common street language in order to propagate - understanding.
Interesting idea. You may be correct.They cite crap like Breitbart and Infowars as serious because they know it will annoy the people who anger them the most.
I remember reading something by either Ann Landers or Dear Abby, back in one of their columns or books, about a woman who wants to know why some people find it necessary to have every other word that comes out of their mouth be a swear word (note, not just once in a great while under stress), but nearly every other sentence is laced with a bad word. One of these ladies wrote something like this: "People who habitually use bad language do so because they are too mentally bankrupt to think of anything better to say."
I never forgot that.
Do you actually have an example.....or are you simply running your mouth again?Once again, your source is a well-known crank. He's a conspiracy-theorist nutbag whose been running his ignorant mouth for years. But once again, you'll defend him because he tells you what you WANT to hear.
I agree with what you said. I don't get why people need to use such language when they can make their points without it. Such language is offensive to me and makes me think less of the people who use it. Does that make me a conservative?I remember reading something by either Ann Landers or Dear Abby, back in one of their columns or books, about a woman who wants to know why some people find it necessary to have every other word that comes out of their mouth be a swear word (note, not just once in a great while under stress), but nearly every other sentence is laced with a bad word. One of these ladies wrote something like this: "People who habitually use bad language do so because they are too mentally bankrupt to think of anything better to say."
I never forgot that.
I listened to the first minute of the video...at least 4 "F bombs" in that time period. I had to get off since I find that very offensive. IF he can ONLY make his point by constantly using foul language, then what does that say about his "points"?
Well DUH....But I doubt he'll become a darling on the left.If those cited people suddenly became darlings of the left, I'd bet a weekly paycheck that these believers would abandon their chosen media authorities. If Alex Jones started working for the Biden administration and parroting the Dem party message, you'd see him lose a massive amount of viewers.
They believe him because he annoys the people who annoy them (ie. educated, intelligent, reasonable people)
ps. in my humble opinion, of course
His own lawyer, in court, described him as a performance artist playing a role, who should not therefore be held responsible for the things he says.Do you actually have an example.....or are you simply running your mouth again?
Just for once I would love to see you respond with an actual amswer rather than your typical stale ad-homs.
Nope! LOL! It makes you an eloquent person who doesn't need to swear because you have enough information that you don't need to fill in the gaps with profanity!I agree with what you said. I don't get why people need to use such language when they can make their points without it. Such language is offensive to me and makes me think less of the people who use it. Does that make me a conservative?![]()
I think the language was a simple reflection of the feeling he had.I remember reading something by either Ann Landers or Dear Abby, back in one of their columns or books, about a woman who wants to know why some people find it necessary to have every other word that comes out of their mouth be a swear word (note, not just once in a great while under stress), but nearly every other sentence is laced with a bad word. One of these ladies wrote something like this: "People who habitually use bad language do so because they are too mentally bankrupt to think of anything better to say."
I never forgot that.
I listened to the first minute of the video...at least 4 "F bombs" in that time period. I had to get off since I find that very offensive. IF he can ONLY make his point by constantly using foul language, then what does that say about his "points"?
Just what in the Alex Jones message was wrong?Interesting idea. You may be correct.
His own lawyer said, under oath, he is a performance artist whose claims should not be taken seriously.Just what in the Alex Jones message was wrong?
WHY HAS NO ONE ADDRESSED THAT? I would say it's because Alex is right and the left that post on CARM can't refute it.
SO THEY ATTACK A PERSONS CHARACTER.
I've already addressed it.Just what in the Alex Jones message was wrong?
WHY HAS NO ONE ADDRESSED THAT? I would say it's because Alex is right and the left that post on CARM can't refute it.
SO THEY ATTACK A PERSONS CHARACTER.
How about a greatly increased incidence of homosexuality in frogs due to chemicals. Where is the data of increased homosexuality in frogs? Where are samples of these chemicals? Where is the analysis of these chemicals?Just what in the Alex Jones message was wrong?
More here-say.His own lawyer said, under oath, he is a performance artist whose claims should not be taken seriously.
If his own lawyer does not believe him, why should anyone else?
And given the lies and outrageously false accusations he has made in the past, why again should he be trusted on this?
Does anyone really think the frogs are turning gay? I mean that is the most ridiculous comment. Perhaps the frogs would have mutations but gay frogs??? LOL!Just what in the Alex Jones message was wrong?
WHY HAS NO ONE ADDRESSED THAT? I would say it's because Alex is right and the left that post on CARM can't refute it.
SO THEY ATTACK A PERSONS CHARACTER.
FTFYMorehere-sayhearsay.
I have no idea as to wether or not Sandy Hook was a red flag event. I've never listen to or investigated the accusations. I don't even know if Alex Jones has said what you say he has said about Sandy hook. All I have heard is claims.How about a greatly increased incidence of homosexuality in frogs due to chemicals. Where is the data of increased homosexuality in frogs? Where are samples of these chemicals? Where is the analysis of these chemicals?
What is wrong is the complete lack of support for his claims. IIRC he is currently losing (or has already lost?) a long legal battle about his claims over Sandy Hook.
If you believe what he says, without independent confirmation, then I have this bridge I can sell you.