All evos have NO idea None. Not enough education to understand no means no.

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
If you claim otherwise that just proves you don't understand synthetic chemistry.

Are you proud of your gross misunderstandings?

This is exactly how evo Pushers are making people increase their distrust of science. Before biology.

Chuck Darwin had not the vaguest clue about science to follow what Dr Tour shares.

Time is the actual enemy of developing "life"

The compounds deteriorate quickly.

10 to the 79th billion zeros possibiliities for combinations in a yeast cell.
 

TeabagSalad

Active member
Have you remembered what subjects you got your degrees in yet?

Are you still having trouble even remembering which university you went too?
 

The Pixie

Active member
If you claim otherwise that just proves you don't understand synthetic chemistry.

Are you proud of your gross misunderstandings?

This is exactly how evo Pushers are making people increase their distrust of science. Before biology.

...
James Tour is famous because he is about the ONLY actual scientist who signed the ID's "Dissent from Darwinism" document. Of course, like all the other signees, his motivation is Christianity (or perhaps Judaism for a couple). It is not science.

On the other hand there are literally millions of scientists who do believe evolution happened, and think abiogenesis is likely too. These are people of all faiths - yes including Christianity - and no faith. They do not believe evolution happened because that is what their preacher tells them to believe. They believe evolution happened because of the evidence.

So congratulations on finding a scientist blinded by religion.

Now see if you can find any actual evidence for your claims.
 

ferengi

Well-known member
Essentially Tour's position is nothing but an argument from personal incredulity, a fact that he tried to cover up by appealing to his qualifications.
And this is an unsupported assertion . LOL And you have no qualifications so where does that put you?
 

e v e

Well-known member
in the satan realm, where is this current earth,
things evolve, expand, revolve and the earth is round. it’s a system where energy lacks... everything dies and deteriorates; nature is pitiless.

in God‘s realm where eden was, and is to be restored, is a cube, as scripture describes, the eden land is flat. nothing evolves. He is without limits.... and all His gorgeous creation lives without suffering, without death... and all of nature is in love with God.
 

Nouveau

Well-known member
in the satan realm, where is this current earth,
things evolve, expand, revolve and the earth is round. it’s a system where energy lacks... everything dies and deteriorates; nature is pitiless.

in God‘s realm where eden was, and is to be restored, is a cube, as scripture describes, the eden land is flat. nothing evolves. He is without limits.... and all His gorgeous creation lives without suffering, without death... and all of nature is in love with God.
Very imaginative.
 

rossum

Active member
They are not imaginative at all once you learn their context and do the exegetical work.
So, once you learn their context and do the exegetical work, Homer's Iliad and Odyssey show that the Greek gods really exist?

There are many ancient texts which talk about many different gods.
 

e v e

Well-known member
So, once you learn their context and do the exegetical work, Homer's Iliad and Odyssey show that the Greek gods really exist?

There are many ancient texts which talk about many different gods.
Consider that to the ancients, a homer was as reporter. Yes, the stories got corrupted, but still the events in them can be traced.

Mythos, as a term, to moderns means fictional but to ancients simply meant 'an oral history'.
Those old tales, recount events in the other world, for example theseus' boat is a very big archetype, having a bigger story behind it and not a myth, but is only understood if we read it carefully together with ancient texts to find the actual events and locate the terms and what they represent. Sometimes a term is a construct, not merely a person or a monster but a construct. Sometimes is meant a land. For example the dragon upon the waters is the realm that conquered eden which sits upon it. And the heaven of those gods (in the area above eden) is the elysian fields, in egyptian glyphs called the sekht fields or sekkt aaru.

The greek gods were the same gods of Egypt that conquered eden which the rg veda also describes. Much of what is in hieroglyphs is about events in the other world, same with rg veda which a later civilization that did not understand it adopted and claimed as its own, and diluted by mixing things up by its misunderstandings of the text.
 
Last edited:
Top