The Holy Spirit didn't become MUTE after the Bible was published - And HE'S the one who leads into all truth.Can a Christian be an Anarcho-Primitivist? If so how would the Bible survive without people being able to know how to read?
the bible is a man made interpretation, such starting when the OT fathers did not listen to God and got cursed... daniel’s vision being sealed.Can a Christian be an Anarcho-Primitivist? If so how would the Bible survive without people being able to know how to read?
Faith in an incarnate God can be arrived at logically and deductively, but being able to visualize that incarnation and understanding the confirmation of the many prophecies towards that incarnation greatly enhance the experience of that incarnation.Can a Christian be an Anarcho-Primitivist? If so how would the Bible survive without people being able to know how to read?
the thing is a soul to arrive to Him...Faith in an incarnate God can be arrived at logically and deductively, but being able to visualize that incarnation and understanding the confirmation of the many prophecies towards that incarnation greatly enhance the experience of that incarnation.
John stated it in John 1 saying to those who received him you gave the power to become sons of God even to those who believe on his name.
Paul likewise in Romans chapter 1 and perhaps part of chapter 2 alluded to the idea that knowledge of God can be seen in the creation. And he made those statements before we understood the tremendous complexity and interdependency of the various parts of nature including living organisms.
I don't buy that last sentence. It is the natural mind which does arrive at him. If there is a fall, there is a remedy for the fall. If the creation is good then man is good. The doctrine of the fall and of a present fallen state of humanity is a source of many of the problems that we have. If we erase that doctrine we alleviate some of the problems.the thing is a soul to arrive to Him...
which the mind’s job it is to prevent!
the natural man acquired at the fall cannot hear Him.
I will go with what Paul says, in this case...I don't buy that last sentence. It is the natural mind which does arrive at him. If there is a fall, there is a remedy for the fall. If the creation is good then man is good. The doctrine of the fall and of a present fallen state of humanity is a source of many of the problems that we have. If we erase that doctrine we alleviate some of the problems.
The carnal mind however likely has problems without constant jabs of reminders.
Yes Paul said the natural man cannot understand the things of the spirit of God, but a natural man will seek to know about the origins of life in the testimony of its grandeur.
A little too heady of a topic right now for me.
I'll remember that you side with Paul next time you disagree with him.I will go with what Paul says, in this case...
respectfully, e v e
ive not except when it’s a bad translation (so far).I'll remember that you side with Paul next time you disagree with him.
Just remember: it is what Paul means when he says the natural man cannot understand the things of the spirit of god; not just what he says!
He means the unregenerate man cannot decipher the spiritual things of Christ/God. Not that the on regenerate man cannot come to Christ and become regenerate or born again.
He who does not believe in Christ is condemned already because he has not believed. The law of faith in his incarnation is the work (john 6:28,29) to become un condemned and spiritual.
You're welcome to quote the prophets!paul understands that at the change to the imperishable we are ‘saved’.
and that also concords with prophets.
The words imperishable and immortal the words everlasting or new have a defining contrast with the words perishable, mortal, first or old.paul understands that at the change to the imperishable we are ‘saved’.
eden is coming backThe words imperishable and immortal the words everlasting or new have a defining contrast with the words perishable, mortal, first or old.
.
When Paul talks about a body in Corinthians he's referring to the collective doctrines truths laws and teachings of Jesus which continue in other people as his body continuing. That concept i of body s developed from 1st Corinthians chapter 2 onward and by John in chapter 5 and 6.
And Jude he refers to the law and nation of Moses as the body of moses. And Hebrews it says that old covenant had been abrogated and was ready to pass away. It was perishable and mortal. So it doesn't use those words. Likewise in Eden in Genesis 3:15 when he gave the proto evangelion he was prophetically canceling the effects of the offense against Genesis 2:17. Therefore both The edenic law of Genesis 2:17 and the Mosaic law were destined to perish from their inception. They were mortal and perishable. At the time of the coming of the new law and the fulfillment of the proto evangelion the mortal and the perishable were replaced by the immortal and unperishable bodies doctrines truths laws and teachings of Christ / God.