Any predictions for the Saturday rally to support the Jan 6 rioters?

[Bob1]

It was nothing but wishful thinking by the nutcase left

Nope. Try reading for comprehension.

 

[Bob1]

The investigation is not meant to clear or pronounce guilt, Your ignorance is astounding

Yet you seem to think it cleared him since charges weren't filed. Your ignorance is profound.

 

[Reformedguy]

Yet you seem to think it cleared him since charges weren't filed. Your ignorance is profound.

It's not their job to pronounce innocence or guilt or clear him of anything. It's to gather evidence. It seems a expert at police investigations would know these things.

 

[Reformedguy]

Nope. Try reading for comprehension.

Okay, I will. Lol

 

[Bob1]

It's not their job to pronounce innocence or guilt or clear him of anything. It's to gather evidence. It seems a expert at police investigations would know these things.

And yet earlier you claimed he was cleared because he wasn't charged.

 

[Bob1]

Okay, I will. Lol

Doesn't seem to have worked for you. You're still repeating the same mistakes.

 

[Reformedguy]

Doesn't seem to have worked for you. You're still repeating the same mistakes.

But its you calling them mistakes. So they are not mistakes Mr. police investigation expert

 

[Reformedguy]

And yet earlier you claimed he was cleared because he wasn't charged.

I did not say he was cleared of anything. I said innocent until proven guilty. Do you understand the difference?

 

[Bob1]

But its you calling them mistakes. So they are not mistakes Mr. police investigation expert

And you keep right on making the same mistakes.

 

[Bob1]

I did not say he was cleared of anything. I said innocent until proven guilty. Do you understand the difference?

You heavily IMPLIED it meant he was cleared. Now you're just hashing words because you know my point stands.

 

[Reformedguy]

You heavily IMPLIED it meant he was cleared. Now you're just hashing words because you know my point stands.

No I did not. That's called seeing what you want to see. That's the point

 

[Reformedguy]

And you keep right on making the same mistakes.

Like conversing with a libtard?

 

[Bob1]

No I did not. That's called seeing what you want to see. That's the point

Yes, you did. That's why you kept fighting me on the point that the investigation didn't clear him.

 

[Bob1]

Like conversing with a libtard?

Like continuing to be a conservatard... and denying that you thought lack of charges being filed during the investigation was the same as clearing him tRump.

 

[Harry Leggs]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1445717048076681216

 

[Bob1]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1445717048076681216

Masks work. Why are you opposed to keeping kids healthy and safe?

 

[Reformedguy]

Like continuing to be a conservatard... and denying that you thought lack of charges being filed during the investigation was the same as clearing him tRump.

Except I never said anything such thing. So just debate yourself. You might actually win one. Or not.

And don't forget to explain how a proper police investigation is conducted. Will it be much longer?

 

[Reformedguy]

Yes, you did. That's why you kept fighting me on the point that the investigation didn't clear him.

A investigation neither clears or pronounces guilt. For the, how many times now??

 

[Bob1]

Except I never said anything such thing. So just debate yourself. You might actually win one. Or not.

And don't forget to explain how a proper police investigation is conducted. Will it be much longer?

And your denial continues...

 

[Bob1]

A investigation neither clears or pronounces guilt. For the, how many times now??

Actually, an investigation can clear a person... but in tRump's case, it did not.
You continue to play desperate word games in order to imply tRump was cleared just because he wasn't charged.
You really don't understand the basic way investigations work, do you?