Bob1
Well-known member
Nope. Try reading for comprehension.It was nothing but wishful thinking by the nutcase left
Nope. Try reading for comprehension.It was nothing but wishful thinking by the nutcase left
Yet you seem to think it cleared him since charges weren't filed. Your ignorance is profound.The investigation is not meant to clear or pronounce guilt, Your ignorance is astounding
It's not their job to pronounce innocence or guilt or clear him of anything. It's to gather evidence. It seems a expert at police investigations would know these things.Yet you seem to think it cleared him since charges weren't filed. Your ignorance is profound.
Okay, I will. LolNope. Try reading for comprehension.
And yet earlier you claimed he was cleared because he wasn't charged.It's not their job to pronounce innocence or guilt or clear him of anything. It's to gather evidence. It seems a expert at police investigations would know these things.
Doesn't seem to have worked for you. You're still repeating the same mistakes.Okay, I will. Lol
But its you calling them mistakes. So they are not mistakes Mr. police investigation expertDoesn't seem to have worked for you. You're still repeating the same mistakes.
I did not say he was cleared of anything. I said innocent until proven guilty. Do you understand the difference?And yet earlier you claimed he was cleared because he wasn't charged.
And you keep right on making the same mistakes.But its you calling them mistakes. So they are not mistakes Mr. police investigation expert
You heavily IMPLIED it meant he was cleared. Now you're just hashing words because you know my point stands.I did not say he was cleared of anything. I said innocent until proven guilty. Do you understand the difference?
No I did not. That's called seeing what you want to see. That's the pointYou heavily IMPLIED it meant he was cleared. Now you're just hashing words because you know my point stands.
Like conversing with a libtard?And you keep right on making the same mistakes.
Yes, you did. That's why you kept fighting me on the point that the investigation didn't clear him.No I did not. That's called seeing what you want to see. That's the point
Like continuing to be a conservatard... and denying that you thought lack of charges being filed during the investigation was the same as clearing him tRump.Like conversing with a libtard?
Masks work. Why are you opposed to keeping kids healthy and safe?
Except I never said anything such thing. So just debate yourself. You might actually win one. Or not.Like continuing to be a conservatard... and denying that you thought lack of charges being filed during the investigation was the same as clearing him tRump.
A investigation neither clears or pronounces guilt. For the, how many times now??Yes, you did. That's why you kept fighting me on the point that the investigation didn't clear him.
And your denial continues...Except I never said anything such thing. So just debate yourself. You might actually win one. Or not.
And don't forget to explain how a proper police investigation is conducted. Will it be much longer?
Actually, an investigation can clear a person... but in tRump's case, it did not.A investigation neither clears or pronounces guilt. For the, how many times now??