No they haven't. You show me one judge that pretends that 1000s sworn affidavits with supporting videos and supported by showing the logical and statistical impossibilities that occurred during the vote, and I can show you one hell of a fraudulent and corrupt judge at the same time.
Are Democrats willing to do what it takes to put Biden and Harris in office?
- Thread starter Tercon
- Start date
People can say whatever they want online, but in court you have to tell the truth.
Trump's lawyers have failed to present any evidence of election fraud in court, and in some cases have acknowledged they have no evidence of fraud.
Facts matter, and if you have no facts that you can present in court, then you have no case.
Give it up.
Biden won by a landslide.
30-40 cases have gone to court and have been rejected, in many cases by Republican appointed judges and sometimes by Trump appointed judges.
The cases they have presented have not met court standards, and judges have pointed out that there is no evidence to support these cases.
Why don't you look at the court record? If you did you would see that Trump is losing consistently, in all states, and before all judges.
It is often Republican officials in these states that are rejecting claims of fraud.
Whateverman
Well-known member
Is this English?
What kind of judge am I supposed to show you again?
You could nip this whole thing in the bud and show us a single judge who's ruled in favor of Team Orange Loser, and ruled that their case demonstrated massive voter fraud in a single state.
You can't though, because you're nothing but a bluff.
Yeah that's what the 1000s of sworn affidavits are for, are you and these corrupt judges pretending they don't exist.
Biden won by cheating and there is going to be hell to pay when this gets to SCOTUS
Whateverman
Well-known member
It's already gotten to SCOTUS once, and they shot it down like knocking a paper plane out of the sky.
Whateverman
Well-known member
Democrats are ready to do what it takes to put Bidden in Harris in office, and that's because it's going to take nothing.
Literally, nothing. That's all Democrats are going to need to do in order for Team Biden to take a seat behind the Resolute Desk on January 20. Just sit back, let the states cast their electoral votes according to the popular vote, and Biden wins.
Easy peasy.
Literally, nothing. That's all Democrats are going to need to do in order for Team Biden to take a seat behind the Resolute Desk on January 20. Just sit back, let the states cast their electoral votes according to the popular vote, and Biden wins.
Easy peasy.
Electric Skeptic
Well-known member
Your sentence doesn't even make sense.
THere is no evidence of fraud and corruption in this election, and it is YOU who are committing fraud and corruption on the readers here by claiming there is.
Electric Skeptic
Well-known member
There is no such evidence.
Electric Skeptic
Well-known member
Yes, they have. Multiple courts, SCOTUS the latest one.
There was no logical or statistical impossibilities that occurred during the vote.
Electric Skeptic
Well-known member
Forty judges, many of the republicans, and they're ALL corrupt and want to deny Trump? Are you serious?
SCOTUS has already declined to even hear it.
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
Kamalala was enthusiastic about sex with Mayor Willie to launch her corrupt career.
Gus Bovona
Well-known member
Are you aware that a sworn affidavit is hearsay in court? When those people who swore in those affidavits appear in a court and are cross-examined, then we can talk. And that saying something that isn't true in a sworn affidavit means nothing unless someone cares to prosecute it.
See this about all the things that had never happened before, until they did.
There may have been fraud, but the question is whether it was significant enough to change any currently certified result. And, whether any claim that significant fraud happened had to have been resolved before yesterday, the Safe Harbour day.
Whateverman
Well-known member
They declined to hear it, in a single written sentence, and not one of ******'s three appointed Justices dissented. Not one Justice on the entire court disagreed with the dismissal.
It's over.
ps. I know that no matter how many times brute facts like this are pointed out to them, *********** will never abandon their mantra.
pps. I also know that labels like "******" and "Trumpanzee" are counter-productive, but in this case, we're debating people who have precluded the possibility of productive conversation.
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
Looks like the Fake News addicts voted for creepy Joe.
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
So how can they call Bidet's deceased voters and verify signatures?
why did crooked Dems hurry to toss envelopes with signatures on mail in ballots?
why did crooked Dems hurry to toss envelopes with signatures on mail in ballots?
Looks like the weeping and gnashing of teeth continues about why suburban women didn't like the White House Groper in Chief.
Electric Skeptic
Well-known member
Faithoverbelief
Well-known member
Corrupt judges that Trump placed. Shows he has not a clue of what he is doing.
