Are Democrats willing to do what it takes to put Biden and Harris in office?

Tercon

Well-known member
It's already gotten to SCOTUS once, and they shot it down like knocking a paper plane out of the sky.
You have been screaming into your echo chamber again. State legislators choose the electors. And Republican State legislators have chosen Republican electors in 7 states including the battle ground states where democrats done all their cheating, and these electors have cast their electoral votes for Trump.
Democrats are ready to do what it takes to put Bidden in Harris in office, and that's because it's going to take nothing.
Literally, nothing. That's all Democrats are going to need to do in order for Team Biden to take a seat behind the Resolute Desk on January 20. Just sit back, let the states cast their electoral votes according to the popular vote, and Biden wins.

Easy peasy.
You're delusional and the above isn't nothing silly, the constitutionally legal route has been taken to remedy the fraud perpetrated by corrupt election officials in these counties.
 

Tercon

Well-known member
Corrupt judges that Trump placed. Shows he has not a clue of what he is doing.
Courts cannot do much, but it is an effective means to inform the public of how corrupt the election officials are in some democrat states. There is a plan in place that follows the constitutionally legal route to remedy the fraud perpetrated by corrupt election officials in some Democrat counties.
 

Tercon

Well-known member
They declined to hear it, in a single written sentence, and not one of ******'s three appointed Justices dissented. Not one Justice on the entire court disagreed with the dismissal.

It's over.

ps. I know that no matter how many times brute facts like this are pointed out to them, *********** will never abandon their mantra.

pps. I also know that labels like "******" and "Trumpanzee" are counter-productive, but in this case, we're debating people who have precluded the possibility of productive conversation.
People who support fraud and corruption are just as corrupt as the democrat election officials who are trying to steal this election through fraud.
 

Tercon

Well-known member
****** supporters support fraud and corruption.

Are you a Democrat?
No, Durrcon. CRAM is a conservative echo chamber, and it's you whose been screaming into it.

For more than a decade now.
No and No.
If you support a fraudulent election, then you are a fraud and corrupt person silly.
 

Tercon

Well-known member
Yup.

Republicans are doing exactly what you whined about Democrats doing; y'all support fraud and corruption.

Projection: a conservative American value.
Since neither you nor anybody else has been able to demonstrate any fraud, irrelevant.
Republicans will do what they have always had to do in dealing with slavery loving corrupt Democrats since the civil war. Republicans gave their lives to free the slaves, when it was and still is the Democrats that enslave people since the 1960s by hoarding them into ghettos and keeping them there on welfare and food stamps. And only letting the slaves out long enough to do their dirty work for them every four years, just around election time.
 

Tercon

Well-known member
Since neither you nor anybody else has been able to demonstrate any fraud, irrelevant.
It's ONLY a fraud and corrupt mind that would consider 100s of sworn affidavits and video evidence of 100s of Poll watchers “no evidence” or “irrelevant” silly.
 

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
It's ONLY a fraud and corrupt mind that would consider 100s of sworn affidavits and video evidence of 100s of Poll watchers “no evidence” or “irrelevant” silly.
It's ONLY a fraud and a corrupt mind that would consider any number of sworn affidavits and video 'evidence' that couldn't stand up in court despite 60 attempts 'evidence' or 'relevant'.
 

Whateverman

Well-known member
It's ONLY a fraud and corrupt mind that would consider 100s of sworn affidavits and video evidence of 100s of Poll watchers “no evidence” or “irrelevant” silly.
If they were credible, they would have been presented in court.

They weren't, so they weren't.

You're a fraud with a corrupt mind if you think evidence lawyers wont present is persuasive.
 
Top