You teach ancient semi Arian heresy with a touch of modern humanism , yet you wish for me to find some authority in you throwing around this word CULT. I am about two seconds from telling you to stop talking to me because ,I cannot take your myopic and rudimentary suppositions due to your ignorance and obstinacy.
According to who, your cult and what they say about it Dude? In other words, this is what I teach because it doesn't agree with your false idea of what "orthodox" Christianity is right?
Of course you want to shut me up and this is common for those who are in darkness, because they can't stand the light when it is presented to them and so they have to shut it out but the light welcomes the darkness because it exposes it for what it truly is, DARKNESS!
I'm sure you mean professions of faith were decreed the moment somebody said" Jesus is the Father" and like your own heresy" Jesus is substantively less than God the Father ".
That is what Jesus said about himself when he said "My Father is Greater than I am" and Paul also confirmed this as well in 1 Corinthians 15:22-29 when he told us that after all things are put under the feet of Jesus, then Jesus himself will also put himself in total subjection to the Father.
Paul also confirmed this when he told us "the head of every woman is the man and the head of the man is Christ and the head of Christ is God"
Truthfully I really view Unitarians Christology not all that much different from Islam Christology of just a man favored by Allah. You start from" just a man uttered into existence ", whereas we start from "God own eternal Word with Him by Himself made in the likeness of sinful flesh ".
That is the pot calling the Kettle black dude, for that is what your little religious club amounts to, for it is no better than Islam or any other false religion.
As I told you before, John never intended us to understand the Logos as anything other than a personification of God's Mind and as defined by the meaning of the word Logos and being the Logos refers to God's mind, the Logos was towards "pros" God and which simply means that God was thinking towards himself just like all men do who are made in his image also.
Even Tertullian understood the Greek words in John 1:1 to be meaning this and here is what he said about it below also.
Here's Tertullian's very interesting explanation of what logos is in his own words from the quote below.
It is just a pity for Tertullian, that all he had to attempt to understand it with was his own fleshy mind and not the mind of God that was in Christ by the indwelling Holy Spirit.Observe, then, that when you are silently conversing with yourself, this very process is carried on within you by your reason, which meets you with a word at every movement of your thought … Whatever you think, there is a word … You must speak it in your mind …
Thus, in a certain sense, the word is a second person within you, through which in thinking you utter speech … The word is itself a different thing from yourself. Now how much more fully is all this transacted in God, whose image and likeness you are? (Against Praxeas 5)
Logos is that voice you hear inside yourself when you are thinking. At least, that's a rough estimation of what logos means. Tertullian goes out of his way to describe it as "a second person within you" because he's bringing up the Logos of God as a second Person of the Trinity.
God, according to the early churches, has always had logos inside of him.
For he still twisted the Logos to be referring to another person and he even did this in regards to men also and spoke of the Logos within them as being a second person within them also and which is foolish nonsense.