She had to run away because she could not prove her claims and her butt got hurt.
AS a Christian can you ever vote DEMOCRATIC
- Thread starter The Prophet
- Start date
Rockson
Well-known member
Much truth to this although not sure one should take a position of taking no heed to it just not sure to what measure Christians should be involved. I think believers can have right intentions BUT we need to be careful NOT to think our goal is to create a morality revolution established by worldly laws and think we've really advanced the Kingdom of God. There's a difference between a morality revolution and spiritual transformation. The Kingdom of God is truly advanced when the spirits of mean are born again and their hearts are changed to be a new creature created in Christ Jesus with the life of God within.
On the other hand Christians, their families and children live in this world too. They do have a right like any other citizen to want to direct the way moral standards are considered and applied by law. To just let go and allow some citizens more equal then others, meaning that others have the right to shape, form and establish how society goes when all the time they had just as much right to have a say as the others I don't think is right either.
The Declaration of Independence doesn't say anything about bearing arms...The right God gives is to obey him.
Why does it need to? The Constitution says it.
Whats your point?
lol you said. More Guns less crime. The issue here is Gun-related crimes. How do more guns = fewer gun-related crimes? Since the discussion is about gun-related crimes, how then could guns not be the problem?
No the data, facts and science say that.
More guns in the hands of the law abiding reduces crime - thats empirical fact.
Because guns are not - its morals or lack thereof thats the problem.
Correct, people do kill because of disregard for human life, however, guns make it easier to kill.
No - its just as easy to kill with other objects - its just that guns have been politicized to eliminate the 2nd Amendment.
you just repeated it ...you have to show that the data is true. The real-world scenario does not support what you say.
Now you are twisting what you said...But in any event, it takes one unlawful event to make a law-abiding person a criminal with a gun.
If guns are not the problem what is the problem in a gun-related crime? Lack of morality is the problem in all crimes, guns are an added problem in gun-related crimes.
Why would the Declaration of Independence say anything about bearing arms? Do you seriously not know the difference between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution?
Already done- Read "More Guns - Less Crime" by Lott.
The law abiding by definition are not criminals.
Morality.
No they are a political issue.
How is just as easy to kill with other objects sir? If that were true people wouldn't need guns. With what other objects can a person easily kill a dozen people 15 or 20 feet away with?
The 2nd Amendment is about a well-regulated militia.
Nice attack: What we know about the Bastille Day killings
What we know about the 14 July 2016 attack in Nice, in which a lorry struck a crowd, killing dozens of people.
www.bbc.com
What do you think the purpose of guns is?
I can hit a target 20 feet away with a bow with my eyes closed.
No, it's about the right of the people to keep and bear arms. That's why it says, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". The "well regulated militia" part of the 2nd Amendment is what is known as a prefatory clause, which is to explain the purpose of the operative clause. It's why the 2nd Amendment says that the right belongs to the people, not to the militia.
Its called reality and common sense -
Anyone can reach in the drawer and grab a butcher knife. It's a whole lot easier.” =
New report: More people killed with knives, other weapons than rifles -https://khqa.com/news/local/new-report-more-people-killed-with-knives-other-weapons-than-rifles-10-17-2019
See above,.
False - the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Our Lord's God
Well-known member
As a Christian you should be more concerned about what your King is doing than what the world is doing.
Ferengi says it does, post #182 in response to post# 179
I never assumed there was no difference. Take up your issue with Ferengi he says in the declaration of independence God gives the rights to bear arms.
So there should be no issue with gun regulation and registration? Lorries need to be regulated and registered.Nice attack: What we know about the Bastille Day killings
What we know about the 14 July 2016 attack in Nice, in which a lorry struck a crowd, killing dozens of people.www.bbc.com
He said there were easier ways to kill people. Follow the argument...If there are easier ways than guns then use the easier way.
I am not doubting that, but not everyone can, plus by the time you reload your bow a gun can send out ten rounds.
It is one sentence sir... “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
It is evident that the people and the well-regulated militia are the same. Else outlaws and criminals would retain that right to keep and bear arms also.
In your view, no one is excluded from keeping and bearing arms. In the view of the 2nd Amendment, only well-regulated people's right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
The "right to bear arms" did not come from God.
post #182...Yes it did - Read the Declaration of Independence
lol a 2019 report may have been using data from 2016... we are in 2021...If you go back further you may find when clubs were the weapon of choice.
You left out half of the sentence...You need to identify who are the people it is referring to. Do you agree that criminals should have the right to keep and bear arms? They are people too you know.