is it true? that is the question.Already done- Read "More Guns - Less Crime" by Lott.
Until they commit a crime. Anyway, your understanding of the 2nd amendment allows for all people to keep and bear arms. To restrict any person from bearing arms would be an infringement on their rights.The law abiding by definition are not criminals.
So what did the immoral person use to kill?Morality.
Only if you make it so. Now you are blaming politicians for gun-related crimes.No they are a political issue.
read itis it true? that is the question.
Not its the plain meaning because thats what it says.Anyway, your understanding of the 2nd amendment allows for all people to keep and bear arms.
Unless they are a criminal.To restrict any person from bearing arms would be an infringement on their rights.
What difference does it make>So what did the immoral person use to kill?
Prove itNow you are blaming politicians for gun-related crimes.
Oh, okay. So it's not that you were making that claim, it's just that you lack the reading comprehension to navigate Ferengi's post. OK. Thanks for the clarification.Ferengi says it does, post #182 in response to post# 179
I never assumed there was no difference. Take up your issue with Ferengi he says in the declaration of independence God gives the rights to bear arms.
reading it does not make it true or false.read it
You didn't say everything that it said...Not its the plain meaning because thats what it says.
It does not say that, unless you are saying that criminals are not people.Unless they are a criminal.
it makes a difference in the use of weapons.What difference does it make>
I already showed the post where you said it.Prove it
Straw man - never said it did - the science makes it soreading it does not make it true or false.
So what?You didn't say everything that it said...
Prove it. Straw man.It does not say that, unless you are saying that criminals are not people.
Your evidence is?it makes a difference in the use of weapons.
SO you refuse to prove your claimsI already showed the post where you said it.
Guns cannot kill on their own...I have never heard about a gun being arrested for killing anyone.Guns can and do stop people who have a disregard for human life.
People use guns to kill because they have guns. Guns in and of themselves are neither good nor bad. People are, that is why guns need to be registered and regulated.That's not a bad thing.
so why are you asking me to read it if it does not say it did? Science does not make anything so.Straw man - never said it did - the science makes it so
that is called lying by omissionSo what?
this is what it says...A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Which is not what you said.Prove it. Straw man.
Your evidence is?
nope, you refuse to read your own post.