Diogenes
Active member
Who told you it was a false concept?
Please post the name and no more.
Name
Bob Dole
Who told you it was a false concept?
Please post the name and no more.
Name
Prove itChristianity is a Nazi religion.
What do you want me to deliver evidence for?You deliver your own evidence.
You ONLY attack and mock Christianity.
You wouldn't dare mock Nazi religions.
Four examples? Heck, just give one example that you can prove with empirical evidence and you win the Nobel Prize in physics. No need for fourGo ahead and demonstrate how NOGOD created matter, energy and the Universe.
Give us 4 examples where NOTHING created Something.
There is no record of Bob Dole ever mentioning your name.Bob Dole
There is no record of Bob Dole ever mentioning your name.
How would you file a claim against him if you landed in Hell and discovered he was wrong?
Only Christians sin, which is why you claim that Jesus did the time for your crime.Who told you it was a false concept?
Please post the name and no more.
Name
I would have to evaluate the alleged evidence and whether it supports the proposition.So how will you know if evidence is actually presented?
Shifting the burden,
An argument from ignorance. How would you know you have not seen any if you admit you would not know what that evidence would look like? Now you commit circular logic.
Hans Kerrl, served as Hitler's Minister for Church Affairs and pushed for "Positive Christianity".Prove it
This is very complicated for atheists.Who told you it was a false concept?
Please post the name and no more.
Name
Hans Kerrl, served as Hitler's Minister for Church Affairs and pushed for "Positive Christianity".
At the time of the Nazi rise to power. Germany was approximately 70% protestant.
So your sources lied.As we know, the Confessing Church didn't exist and there were no other internal squabbles and every German saw Hitler as the Second Coming and fully support Nazi eugenics with full knowledge.
So your sources lied.
Can't respond to the thread?
Anything but the blatantly obvious and literal is beyond his comprehension.Can't understand obvious sarcasm?
Thats not answering the question - again - So how will you know if evidence is actually presented?I would have to evaluate the alleged evidence and whether it supports the proposition.
By demanding I present evidence you dont present evidence for your POV.How am I shifting the burden?
Which would be what exactly?Evidence for a creator of the universe for starters.
Again - shifting the burden.I'm asking you to present the evidence you base your beliefs on.
Then how do you know if that evidence has been presented or not?Is said I'm not sure of what would be evidence for a God that was solely a creator.
Why?An interactive God is a different proposition especially if that God is claimed to act on a supernatural plane.