Atheist or Agnostic

[SavedByTheLord]

Just as varves, tree rings and annual coral growth are exact dating.

They have numbers on them?
All have been shown to have multiples per year under certain conditions like the flood and the greatly challenging and changing climate in the decades or centuries that followed,

Can you meet the challenge yet?

 

[rossum]

They have numbers on them?

Can you count? Scientists can: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years ... It isn't rocket science.

Can you meet the challenge yet?

Why should I? You can't meet the challenge either. Both of us assume that Last Thursdayism is false.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Can you count? Scientists can: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years ... It isn't rocket science.


Why should I? You can't meet the challenge either. Both of us assume that Last Thursdayism is false.

I have already destroyed evolution and billions of years forever.

 

[Tetsugaku]

I have already destroyed evolution and billions of years forever.

And yet no-one thinks your arguments have any merit whatsoever, and we've all explained why.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

And yet no-one thinks your arguments have any merit whatsoever, and we've all explained why.

Well the damned of course do not believe, but one day they will.

 

[Tetsugaku]

Well the damned of course do not believe, but one day they will.

Well, the YECs of course do not learn, but one day they... ah... hmm.

 

[Whatsisface]

Well the damned of course do not believe, but one day they will.

This is included in the things you've convinced no one about.

 

[Temujin]

I have already destroyed evolution and billions of years forever.

Another totally false statement.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Another totally false statement.

Read your post to yourself.

 

[Temujin]

Read your post to yourself.

I have. It still applies to you. If you read your posts to yourself before posting, you might not make so many egregious errors.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I had. It still applies to you. If you read your posts to yourself before posting, you might not make so many egregious errors.

what was the first living thing? More questions coming.

 

[Temujin]

what was the first living thing? More questions coming.

More evasion coming. Running away isn't the answer. Have the guts to follow through an argument to it's conclusion. For once.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

More evasion coming. Running away isn't the answer. Have the guts to follow through an argument to it's conclusion. For once.

I am here for you.

What was the first living creature?

 

[rossum]

I have already destroyed evolution and billions of years forever.

And I have this bridge I can sell you.

You will need to do a lot better than you have so far. I, and others, have even told you some of what you have to do. Like that DNA from wombats, armadillos and wolves. The fact that your YEC sources do not have that data should give you a clue that they are lacking any scientific evidence.

 

[rossum]

What was the first living creature?

You tell us. What was the first living creature that God made? Be specific.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

And I have this bridge I can sell you.

You will need to do a lot better than you have so far. I, and others, have even told you some of what you have to do. Like that DNA from wombats, armadillos and wolves. The fact that your YEC sources do not have that data should give you a clue that they are lacking any scientific evidence.

The divergence of the DNA of all creatures after the flood would be different for different creatures, so you have no clue.

Note, you have the bridge so you must have bought it already.

 

[rossum]

The divergence of the DNA of all creatures after the flood would be different for different creatures

So, show us this divergence for wombats, armadillos and wolves. You claim it exists, so show us the evidence in their DNA sequences.

Failure to provide the evidence will result in our continued disbelief in your unevidenced claims.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

So, show us this divergence for wombats, armadillos and wolves. You claim it exists, so show us the evidence in their DNA sequences.

Failure to provide the evidence will result in our continued disbelief in your unevidenced claims.

From the kinds on the ark. I have no details about that.

How do you explain the Cambrian explosion?

Why are there living fossils?

How does one explain polystrate trees?

How does one explain soft tissue and blood vessels in dinosaur tissue?

How does one explain dinosaur tissue with DNA and other biomolecules still being intact?

How does one explain dinosaur tissue, and diamonds that are not C-14 dead?

Why is there too much C-14 in some samples of coal and fossilized wood?

How do you explain parentless polonium 210 radiohaloes in granites?

How do you explain elliptical polonium 210 halos in the same strata with circular halos?

There is a great deception in some of the ages that are quoted by evolutionists. Why the deception?

There are inconsistencies in the radioactive dating results of many things. So isochron dating has been used. But even then, there are many large discrepancies. Why?

The inconsistencies in the dating of things and in all “clocks” used to set the age of things can be simply explained if some miraculous events occurred. These would be 6-day creation, the fall of man and the curse on creation and the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago.

What is the recipe for primordial soup, and can I buy a can of it?

There is a lack of a 50-50 racemization of amino acids in fossils. Why?

There are discontinuous fossil sequences in the fossil record. Why?

Oil, coal, and opals can be formed rapidly under certain conditions. Why the deception?

The evidence is that the coal beads and fossilized wood were formed rapidly. Why?

There are missing layers representing millions of years. Why?

Why are there ephemeral markings at the boundaries of layers? That shows rapid deposit.

If intelligent man was around for 100,000 years or so, why did he not figure out how to drop a seed in the ground and farm?

History is too short. Why?

The Great Barrier reef is only 4200 years old; the oldest tree is only 4300 years old. Why?

The age of the Sahara Desert is only 4000 years old. Why?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

So it is certain that all atheists and agnostics are going to damnation, This is worse than Pascal’s wager.

 

[Tetsugaku]

So it is certain that all atheists and agnostics are going to damnation, This is worse than Pascal’s wager.

Yes, PW is a bad argument but at least it's an argument. Your above faith-based declaration of certainty is definitely worse.