Atheists and Agnostics risk infinite loss for no gain.

Lol! That would be you.
Can you meet the challenge ?
Can you refute the irrefutable proof that used the law of non contradiction?
Can you refute the irrefutable proof that used mathematical induction?
Can you meet the challenge?
Can you refute all those amazing prophecies?
Can you refute all that advance knowledge?
Can you answer all those things that prove your theories of evolution and billions of years false?

NO to all of them.
 
Can you meet the challenge ?
Can you refute the irrefutable proof that used the law of non contradiction?
Can you refute the irrefutable proof that used mathematical induction?
Can you meet the challenge?
Can you refute all those amazing prophecies?
Can you refute all that advance knowledge?
Can you answer all those things that prove your theories of evolution and billions of years false?

NO to all of them.
Because none of them actually exist. You don't understand the law of non-contradiction . Your use of mathematical induction is hopelessly flawed, the "amazing" prophecies have all been debunked, the advanced knowledge has been shown to be no such thing , you have produced nothing, zilch, nada that even suggests the possibility that theories of evolution and millions of years are false. Worst of all your copper-bottomed dishonest denial that all these refutations have taken place is casting serious doubt on your personal integrity and/or cognitive abilities.
 
Because none of them actually exist. You don't understand the law of non-contradiction . Your use of mathematical induction is hopelessly flawed, the "amazing" prophecies have all been debunked, the advanced knowledge has been shown to be no such thing , you have produced nothing, zilch, nada that even suggests the possibility that theories of evolution and millions of years are false. Worst of all your copper-bottomed dishonest denial that all these refutations have taken place is casting serious doubt on your personal integrity and/or cognitive abilities.
So you cannot refute.
All creation proves your theories false.
 
All creation proves your theories false.
No. All creation proves YEC false. YEC's only support is in a literal interpretation of the Bible, not in the study of creation. Or do you have those DNA samples form wombats, armadillos and wolves, showing a genetic bottleneck in the last 4,500 years in all three clades.

YEC is refuted by creation.
 
No. All creation proves YEC false. YEC's only support is in a literal interpretation of the Bible, not in the study of creation. Or do you have those DNA samples form wombats, armadillos and wolves, showing a genetic bottleneck in the last 4,500 years in all three clades.

YEC is refuted by creation.
You have no clue how each diversified after the flood genetically.
 
You have no clue how each diversified after the flood genetically.
Ah... this is progress. Please provide the pedigrees for wombats, armadillos and wolves for the first 500 years after the flood. Obviously you do have a clue how they diversified genetically. Oh... Perhaps you don't?

We'll get back to you.
 
Can you meet the challenge?
Your bogus challenge? Already addressed here.

Can you refute the irrefutable proof that used the law of non contradiction?
Refuted here.

Can you refute the irrefutable proof that used mathematical induction?
Refuted here.

Can you refute all those amazing prophecies?
Refuted here.

Can you refute all that advance knowledge?
Refuted here.

Can you answer all those things that prove your theories of evolution and billions of years false?
There aren't any. And your own links refute you.

NO to all of them.
Given the above, this is a profoundly dishonest comment.
 
How would you know that?

The DNA proves that God Almighty created all things and the DNA of all creatures matches the Biblical timeline.
Both your statements are untrue. The genotype of every extant species on earth proves that there was no worldwide Flood in the earth's recent past.
 
I clicked and it was just a waste of time.

Refute it right here.
I'm not going to waste my time further by repeating detailed rebuttals that you've already ignored once and clearly have no intention of ever addressing. I posted the links not so you could address them, but to prove how dishonest you are in claiming our rebuttals don't exist.
 
Why? Don't you know how to use links? All you have to do is click on the blue writing. Don't demand that others do your work for you. Don't be lazy.
I followed the links and there was no answer. Are you embarrassed that you have no answers.

what was the first living thing?
what came before the Big Bang?
 
This is what honest people refer to as a blatant lie.
False accusations again.
Right here refute it , you can copy and paste from the link.
No one has ever given an actual answer to these 2 simple and required questions.
Copy and paste it right here, right now.

If not who is not being honest.

what was the first living thing?
what came before the Big Bang?
 
Back
Top