Atheists and Agnostics risk infinite loss for no gain.

[SavedByTheLord]

Your problem here is that the Einsteinian universe is a four dimensional manifold, with the fourth dimension being time. So the question implied, without evidence, the existence of a one-dimensional manifold, time, before the Big Bang. That will require a great deal of work, as much work as Einstein and others put into General Relativity.

That work was not shown, or referenced in the question.

What was there before the Big Bang?

 

[rossum]

Again, you said they might discover genetics that 'promote' homosexuality

They have. See Camperio Ciani (2008) Sexually Antagonistic Selection in Human Male Homosexuality. That "sexually antagonistic" means that a particular gene combination increases childbearing in women, while making men trend towards homosexuality. A"Phwoar, he's hunky" gene combo if you like. The increased fertility in women compensates for the decreased fertility in gay men, so the genes remain in the population, rather than being eliminated by natural selection.

 

[rossum]

What was there before the Big Bang?

Define "before" in this context. Remember that you do not have access to the Einsteinian four-dimensional manifold.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Define "before" in this context. Remember that you do not have access to the Einsteinian four-dimensional manifold.

Is timing running forward or backwards?

 

[BMS]

Your problem here is that the Einsteinian universe

not interested in why you don't consider a question, a question.

 

[BMS]

Define "before" in this context. Remember that you do not have access to the Einsteinian four-dimensional manifold.

Define 'define'

 

[Temujin]

Is timing running forward or backwards?

Irrelevant. Time "before" time existed is a meaningless concept.

 

[rossum]

Is timing running forward or backwards?

At the quantum level it runs both ways.

Once again you have failed to answer my question.

 

[rossum]

Define 'define'

I'll chalk that one up as a loss for you. Alternatively go and look in a dictionary.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I'll chalk that one up as a loss for you. Alternatively go and look in a dictionary.

please refute all these and everything else I have posted
Your work is cut out for you.

They were C-14 dated so each Dino figurine destroys evolution and billions of years.

Hapgood submitted the samples to the Laboratory of Isotopes Inc. in New Jersey. The results were as follows:

Sample No. 1	(I-3842) 3590 + - 100 (C.1640 BC)
Sample No. 2	(I-4015) 6480 + - 170 (C. 4530 BC)
Sample No. 3	(I-4031)3060 + - 120 (C. 1110 BC)

The Stegosaurus clobbers evolution and billions of years too.
You are correct about Camboia but defeated of course.

Did Ancient Man See Dinosaurs? These Carvings and Artifacts Say Maybe​

What the farmer uncovered was an amazing collection of pieces, many of which appeared to be dinosaurs. If authentic, the figurines seemed to show that ancient people living in what is now Mexico had knowledge of a wide range of dinosaur species.

historydaily.org
But it is all over the world.

Ancient Dinosaur Depictions | Genesis Park​

www.genesispark.com

 

[Temujin]

please refute all these and everything else I have posted
Your work is cut out for you.

They were C-14 dated so each Dino figurine destroys evolution and billions of years.

Hapgood submitted the samples to the Laboratory of Isotopes Inc. in New Jersey. The results were as follows:

Sample No. 1	(I-3842) 3590 + - 100 (C.1640 BC)
Sample No. 2	(I-4015) 6480 + - 170 (C. 4530 BC)
Sample No. 3	(I-4031)3060 + - 120 (C. 1110 BC)

The Stegosaurus clobbers evolution and billions of years too.
You are correct about Camboia but defeated of course.

Did Ancient Man See Dinosaurs? These Carvings and Artifacts Say Maybe​

What the farmer uncovered was an amazing collection of pieces, many of which appeared to be dinosaurs. If authentic, the figurines seemed to show that ancient people living in what is now Mexico had knowledge of a wide range of dinosaur species.

historydaily.org
But it is all over the world.

Ancient Dinosaur Depictions | Genesis Park​

www.genesispark.com

You do know that constantly repeating the same post on multiple threads is against forum rules? Particularly when the post is full of falsehoods.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You do know that constantly repeating the same post on multiple threads is against forum rules? Particularly when the post is full of falsehoods.

False accusations are against the rules
My posts are not the same just have some the same.

about the Stegosaurs, can you explain that?

 

[Temujin]

False accusations are against the rules
My posts are not the same just have some the same.

about the Stegosaurs, can you explain that?

I have. Learn to read.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I have. Learn to read.

Since you have no real explanation, that is just 1 of the many irrefutably things that prove evolution and billions of years are a lie.

 

[Temujin]

Since you have no real explanation, that is just 1 of the many irrefutably things that prove evolution and billions of years are a lie.

No, that's not the way to deal with explanations. You need to show why your depiction of a fantasy animal that looks nothing like a Stegosaurus, is really a Stegosaurus. Just saying that it is, doesn't do it. Quoting known liars and conmen who just say that it is doesn't do it either. Explain why this is a Stegosaurus. Just for once, try honest debate. You will still lose, but you won't feel so soiled.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

No, that's not the way to deal with explanations. You need to show why your depiction of a fantasy animal that looks nothing like a Stegosaurus, is really a Stegosaurus. Just saying that it is, doesn't do it. Quoting known liars and conmen who just say that it is doesn't do it either. Explain why this is a Stegosaurus. Just for once, try honest debate. You will still lose, but you won't feel so soiled.

It is a Stegosaurus.

 

[Temujin]

It is a Stegosaurus.

Why? What makes it so?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Why? What makes it so?

The plates on the back

 

[Temujin]

The plates on the back

You mean like an armadillo, or a pangolin? While the other features such as the head and tail you ignore.

 

[Whatsisface]

False accusations are against the rules
My posts are not the same just have some the same.

about the Stegosaurs, can you explain that?

There is no academic consensus on what animal is depicted. The supposed back plates are likely stylized background foliage, present in many of the other reliefs at the temple.

Found here.