SavedByTheLord
Well-known member
Noted.Do you understand what the word "previous" means? You remember nothing previous to your 5th birthday, including any previous lives.
Noted.Do you understand what the word "previous" means? You remember nothing previous to your 5th birthday, including any previous lives.
You are not understanding the Bible, you are understanding Joe Price posting on the internet. As Abraham Lincoln said: "Don't trust everything you see on the internet."You have no understanding of how to understand the Bible.
That might explain a few things. You are saying that you are no different to the day you were born, not having changed at all, and are still the same person as you were then.I have never been reincarnated and billions would say the same.
What??????You are not understanding the Bible, you are understanding Joe Price posting on the internet. As Abraham Lincoln said: "Don't trust everything you see on the internet."
That might explain a few things. You are saying that you are no different to the day you were born, not having changed at all, and are still the same person as you were then.
I suggest that you read up on Heraclitus and crossing a river.
Really? I've just consulted the rules, and there's nothing which supports your claim. Here they are:False accusations are against the rules
I already have.I forget. Look it up.How many people are in Jesus' genealogy?
How many times have you read the whole Bible?I already have.
You're conceding that I know more about the bible than you do.
Why are you demanding exact details from people and then refusing to supply even the most basic details of biblical knowledge?
I am sorry I surprised you. Joe Price's webpage is not the Bible. The Bible does not say either "X is the father of Mary" or "Mary is the daughter of X" in either genealogy.What??????
Already refuted this as have many.I am sorry I surprised you. Joe Price's webpage is not the Bible. The Bible does not say either "X is the father of Mary" or "Mary is the daughter of X" in either genealogy.
Those genealogies in Matthew and Luke are another contradiction in the Bible.
More than you. Enough to know that the bible provides multiple genealogies for Jesus, which is a contradiction.How many times have you read the whole Bible?
How many times have you read the whole Bible? the whole OT, the whole NT, all of Paul's letters beginning with Paul?More than you. Enough to know that the bible provides multiple genealogies for Jesus, which is a contradiction.
It proves the Bible is false - at least to some degree.
Is it 100% true that trees have hands and hills can sing? No, and you agree that it is not true, but poetic. You are overclaiming here. Do you think that Jesus' parables are actually true, or was He telling a story with a moral?The Bible is the truth, 100% true.
Just poetic languageIs it 100% true that trees have hands and hills can sing? No, and you agree that it is not true, but poetic. You are overclaiming here. Do you think that Jesus' parables are actually true, or was He telling a story with a moral?
You need to look at the Bible more flexibly.
Which is what I said. Poetic language is not "100% true". You are overclaiming here. That is a mistake with the current unbelieving audience. You are not preaching to the choir now.Just poetic language
Sure. Poetic language is not necsearrily true. Also prophecy in the Bible uses figurative language. The beast does no have 7 heads in Rev 13.Which is what I said. Poetic language is not "100% true". You are overclaiming here. That is a mistake with the current unbelieving audience. You are not preaching to the choir now.
Agreed. However there is much disagreement about whether Genesis is in the historical part or in the poetic part. You are treating it as historical, while we are treating it as a poetic creation myth.But most of the Bible is narrative and records real historical events.
Genesis is absolutely historical.Agreed. However there is much disagreement about whether Genesis is in the historical part or in the poetic part. You are treating it as historical, while we are treating it as a poetic creation myth.
Similarly with the Flood. There probably was a large flood, as mentioned in both Genesis and the Epic of Gilgamesh. However, the scientific evidence shows that the flood was not worldwide. That is poetic/mythical. Hence that part of Genesis is a mix of history and myth/poetry.
The ages of the early patriarchs is another indication that Genesis contains a lot of myth/poetry. When the Sumerian King List says that before the flood (yes, it gets mentioned there as well) king En-men-lu-ana rules for over 43,000 years then we know this is mythology, not accurate history. We are not treating Genesis differently, we are treating it like any other ancient document from that time and place. Men do not live for either 800 years or for 43,000 years.
You have evidence that serpents can talk? You have evidence of magic trees? You have evidence of an angel with a sword blocking entry to a garden?Genesis is absolutely historical.
Satan was the serpent who speaks through all evolutionists and billons of years people.You have evidence that serpents can talk? You have evidence of magic trees? You have evidence of an angel with a sword blocking entry to a garden?
Really?
I have this bridge I can sell you...
How do you tell the difference? The Bible contains much poetic language that you claim is "scientific knowledge".Sure. Poetic language is not necsearrily true. Also prophecy in the Bible uses figurative language. The beast does no have 7 heads in Rev 13.
But most of the Bible is narrative and records real historical events.