What does it have to do with my question?
Speak for yourself. Management did pretty well removing your recent rule-breaking and very offensive post.
You've lost track of the context when I brought up reciprocity. The context wasn't here at CARM, it was in my community:
Oh, you mean your proselytizing.
I did answer, now answer my question.
I scanned the last several pages here and didn't find anything by you that answered my question. If you can quote a post of yours that you think answered my question, I'm happy to answer your question (assuming the post you quote actually does answer my question).
Yes, post 101 is all that need said. If that is insufficient for you then you'll just have to be satisfied. I am satisfied in the responses you've given because I don't have any expectations.
Exactly what part of post 101 do you think answers the question, "Do you understand my point about reciprocity?"
All of it.
Yes, your simple idea is clear, and the reasons it is meaningless to me are provided.
Finally! Although you couldn't resist the pejorative "simple," this is actually an answer to my question. If my reciprocity idea is clear to you, then you understand it.
Yeah, it took so long for you to answer such a simple question of mine, that I've lost enthusiasm for continuing this conversation with you. Bye bye, you can have the last word.
There is no other way to describe it, unless you think you are providing anything but simple information.
lol
You would ban free speech then? All institutions should be open to criticism in a healthy democracy, including religion. This is a place for debating the existence of God and you see denegration behind every corner, in your shadow and under your bed. Considering this and your lack of meaningful posts, perhaps this isn't the best place for you.
I'll type slower.
Excellent idea, that way you'll capture your thoughts more thoroughly.
The problem with your assessment is that you see sincere, legitimate questions as denigration. The consequence of following your take on this would be censorship. Considering you live in the land of the free, I wonder at you taking this line particularly as all institutions should be open to criticism and satire in a healthy democracy.
The problem with your idea is you thinking yourself as asking "honest and legitimate questions."
The problem here is you. Most of your posts display a negative attitude to atheists in that they can do no right. That is an unrealistic bias on your part.
The problem here is you. Most of your posts display a negative attitude to christians in that they can do no right. This is an unrealistic bias on your part.
This is not true. If someone is rude and insulting to me I will give as good as I get in return, note in return. But if someone wants to discuss issues I will do so impartially. You don't discuss and mostly sneer.
Glad you admit you sneer. You are so defensive. You must be insecure in your beliefs.