Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being vaccinated were killed by the vaccine

[Beloved Daughter]

So then, who has the accurate news?

How about what I watch or read.
The worst is MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, and most mainstream networks. I use Mozilla to see the days headlines and choose if I will look at them or not. Most of the time I don't. Just lies, half truths, untruths, speculation, gossip and pure folly.

 

[Backup]

Here's the sad part.....the things we were saying a year ago might happen....are happening.

Like all that voter fraud being found and Trump being reinstated?

Unfortunatly our "fake news" has turned out to be correct.

BTW: Don't forget to mark your calendar for booster 4.

What did you predict? That almost everyone dying of COVID today is unvaccinated?

It is certainly true, that given the facts, few people imagined anyone could be so selfish, reckless, and/or stupid as not to get vaccinated.

 

[Backup]

How about what I watch or read.
The worst is MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, and most mainstream networks. I use Mozilla to see the days headlines and choose if I will look at them or not. Most of the time I don't. Just lies, half truths, untruths, speculation, gossip and pure folly.

Are these “headlines” you seek out from right-wing conspiracy blogs?

You could pick one of the few reliable conservative news sources, like the Wall Street Journal, and read it. Even if it tells you what you don’t want to hear.

If you decide on your “facts” and then seek out confirmation bias, you are just wasting your time, and smart people will quickly figure out you have no idea what’s going on.

 

[Beloved Daughter]

Are these “headlines” you seek out from right-wing conspiracy blogs?

You could pick one of the few reliable conservative news sources, like the Wall Street Journal, and read it. Even if it tells you what you don’t want to hear.

If you decide on your “facts” and then seek out confirmation bias, you are just wasting your time, and smart people will quickly figure out you have no idea what’s going on.

No, No and No.

You have quite an imagination. It borders on a personal attack, now I need to decide what I should do about it.

 

[Harry Leggs]

Trying to change the subject?

You punked out. That is all we need to know.

 

[CrowCross]

How about what I watch or read.
The worst is MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, and most mainstream networks. I use Mozilla to see the days headlines and choose if I will look at them or not. Most of the time I don't. Just lies, half truths, untruths, speculation, gossip and pure folly.

But you're smart enough to know all the alt news is always wrong??

 

[CrowCross]

/or stupid as not to get vaccinated.

Not wanting spike proteins attacking your heart is stiupid?

 

[Harry Leggs]

Are these “headlines” you seek out from right-wing conspiracy blogs?

The souce does not matter if the info is correct. Stop appealing to logic fallacies.

You could pick one of the few reliable conservative news sources, like the Wall Street Journal, and read it. Even if it tells you what you don’t want to hear.

You going to pay the subscription price for WSJ?

If you decide on your “facts” and then seek out confirmation bias, you are just wasting your time, and smart people will quickly figure out you have no idea what’s going on.

If you appeal is to smart people then stop appealing to logic fallacies which denotes the exact opposite result. Who cares about your evals in the first place since you or any other have convinced us of the benefits of the three jabs it takes to get to fully vaxxed status. The jab is a cash cow for big pharma with zero liability from the government. That is reason enough to refuse the shots. None of you have and none of your doctors will debate the subject when they all can ignore and come up with lame excuses. If their case is so strong then why are they refusing to debate? Speaking of stupid? Fauci is not debating anybody. He refuses and instead panders to the press.

 

[ferengi]

If you want to be taken seriously perhaps you should avoid relying on information involving the performance artist Alex Jones.

If you want to be taken seriously perhaps you should avoid the fallacies of poisoning the well, unsupported assertions and hypocrisy.

 

[Yakuda]

The souce does not matter if the info is correct. Stop appealing to logic fallacies.

You going to pay the subscription price for WSJ?

If you appeal is to smart people then stop appealing to logic fallacies which denotes the exact opposite result. Who cares about your evals in the first place since you or any other have convinced us of the benefits of the three jabs it takes to get to fully vaxxed status. The jab is a cash cow for big pharma with zero liability from the government. That is reason enough to refuse the shots. None of you have and none of your doctors will debate the subject when they all can ignore and come up with lame excuses. If their case is so strong then why are they refusing to debate? Speaking of stupid? Fauci is not debating anybody. He refuses and instead panders to the press.

Yeah the left can't get past that first one. The source is irrelevant to whether or not what's being reported is true or not. They think the NYT never lies while Fox always lies. They are very simple minded

 

[Electric Skeptic]

You punked out. That is all we need to know.

False and unsupported.

 

[TeabagSalad]

If you want to be taken seriously perhaps you should avoid the fallacies of poisoning the well, unsupported assertions and hypocrisy.

That's rich coming from you! Given about 90% of your posts are just trolling.

 

[ferengi]

That's rich coming from you! Given about 90% of your posts are just trolling.

More projection

 

[Beloved Daughter]

But you're smart enough to know all the alt news is always wrong??

You should stop before this escalates. I simply said that I don't watch Alex Jones and I never will.

Are these “headlines” you seek out from right-wing conspiracy blogs?

You could pick one of the few reliable conservative news sources, like the Wall Street Journal, and read it. Even if it tells you what you don’t want to hear.

If you decide on your “facts” and then seek out confirmation bias, you are just wasting your time, and smart people will quickly figure out you have no idea what’s going on.

Right out of the gate I get remarks about right wing conspiracy blogs, confirmation bias, questions regarding my intelligence and telling me that I have no idea what's going on. All personal attacks, based on the facts that I don't watch Jones.

This is a discussion board. You're not discussing anything other than hurling insults. A believer and a non-believer engaged in this nonsense. Shameful.

 

[Yakuda]

You should stop before this escalates. I simply said that I don't watch Alex Jones and I never will.


Right out of the gate I get remarks about right wing conspiracy blogs, confirmation bias, questions regarding my intelligence and telling me that I have no idea what's going on. All personal attacks, based on the facts that I don't watch Jones.

This is a discussion board. You're not discussing anything other than hurling insults. A believer and a non-believer engaged in this nonsense. Shameful.

You said this in post #67:

"I have and I don't want to do it again."

What were you referring to having seen that you don't want to again?

 

[Bonnie]

Alex Jones has the credibility of bat guano.

You do know bat guano can be used as fertilizer, don't you?

How appropriate....

 

[Backup]

No, No and No.

You have quite an imagination. It borders on a personal attack, now I need to decide what I should do about it.

Just kind of curious where you are getting your information from.

From my experience, people who trash on the mainstream media, usually get their "information" from sources that are a thousand times crazier than any regular news station or paper.

 

[Bonnie]

Just kind of curious where you are getting your information from.

From my experience, people who trash on the mainstream media, usually get their "information" from sources that are a thousand times crazier than any regular news station or paper.

That has been my experience on here, as well--they tend to get it from Gateway Pundit, Natural News, Epoch Times, WND, Infowars, and other of the more...bizarre and far right blogs/sources.

I don't watch news on TV, except maybe for some local stuff and the weather. Most of the time I get my news from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution newspaper that we get online.

 

[Yakuda]

That has been my experience on here, as well--they tend to get it from Gateway Pundit, Natural News, Epoch Times, WND, Infowars, and other of the more...bizarre and far right blogs/sources.

I don't watch news on TV, except maybe for some local stuff and the weather. Most of the time I get my news from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution newspaper that we get online.

The Atlanta Urinal and Constipation?

Do you have any idea how intellectually lazy you sound disregarding a source simply because you think it's "crazy"? A source no matter how crazy you think it is is either right or wrong.

 

[Authentic Nouveau]

You could pick one of the few reliable conservative news sources, like the Wall Street Journal, and read it. Even if it tells you what you don’t want to hear.

If you decide on your “facts” and then seek out confirmation bias, you are just wasting your time, and smart people will quickly figure out you have no idea what’s going on.

I really like you referring to the WSJ

I have been interviewed 2 times by them and quoted on the front page above the fold. Twice. They knew I was a best source. Several sources told them I would be a great source. I was even a much better source with much more information than they thought I knew.

But they misquoted me, they pushed their narrative and I knew it from the tone in their slanted questions.
They are not reliable.