Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being vaccinated were killed by the vaccine

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
Just kind of curious where you are getting your information from.

From my experience, people who trash on the mainstream media, usually get their "information" from sources that are a thousand times crazier than any regular news station or paper.
So. I have posted that I have never owned an acre of land in Texas. Not one acre. You have told us that i claimed to be the largest organic farmer in Texas.

The information we get from you was crafted by you . From the systemicbackupism supply chain.
 

Whateverman

Well-known member
I really like you referring to the WSJ

I have been interviewed 2 times by them and quoted on the front page above the fold. Twice. They knew I was a best source. Several sources told them I would be a great source. I was even a much better source with much more information than they thought I knew.
You obviously take much pride in these two occasions.

Please list the first three sentences of each of these times you were quoted. We're curious about the expertise they found you to be credible in.
 

Harry Leggs

Super Member
lol...seriously, if you're going to Alex Jones for information then you're asking to be fed rubbish.
Actually, Jones is informative and you might know that if you took time to actually listen. His guests may tell you things you need to know that is ignored in other media sources supporting the vaccine fascist agenda. Attacking the program is ignoring the information presented. It is a dodge.
A study presented by a known COVID-conspiracy theorist isn't a good source of information.
These are debate killers by half-wits/low infos/ shallow thinkers who cannot defend their positions. Just vilify and name call as debate subs. Science is about debate and critical analysis. What is advocated here is religion where dissent is treated as heresy. Fauci et all is pope and issuing papal bulls and everyone else being obedient.
Now, to address the "science", the so called study bases its results on only 15 autopsies, and also gives no indication on how the subjects were selected.
They were dead is how they were selected. We can start there.
As someone who works with statistics as a profession the fact that the study contains only 15 subjects is an immediate red flag (at least 30 data points are required to start to form any statistically significant conclusions). Then there is the lack of detail - no indication of where the study took place, no details of the paper and to which publications it has been submitted to for peer review. In short, it's nonsense.
Peer review papers not needed to get to the moon or mars. Peer review papers not needed for the Manhatten project. Galileo would not have survived peer review. In short peer review is subject to plenty of flaws. Einstein did not do peer review. Peer review guarantees mediocrity and groupthink. Reversion to the mean since not all in science are equally capable. There is no incentive for one to review another. They do not get credit, their name does not appear, not paid for their work. No scientist or group enjoys being proved wrong and Fauci has never done peer review in his advocating of AZT or the C-19 shot. Fauci simply goes to the press and ignores peer analysis, refuses to debate. If you are so big on peer review then tell it to Fauci. As is you all come across as two-faced low infos on a foundation of logic fallacies who do not pay attention to detail.
I know that you are terrified of the vaccine because you don't understand it,
You don't know much at all and behave like a shill for the vax fascists. Attacking the source as a sub for actually attacking the argument.

 
Last edited:

Magdalena

Well-known member
Well, I'll be a case in point, then. I've had 13 heart attacks over the last 30 years, two open Hearts (Quad and a single) I'm carrying 21 stents, and the last Angiogram in the beginning of December didn't reveal any new blockages. I've had Advanced Coronary artery disease diagnosed over the last 20 years, I've got type 2 diabetes, and diagnosed congestive heart failure (my "normal" blood oxygen is running between 85, and 95, and my BP was measured Tuesday at 91 over 42). Let's see if I croak after getting the "Booster" this Friday (I was "Fully Vaxxed" with Pfizer in February - which didn't kill me- so I'll "boost" with Moderna). If I disappear on Saturday, y'all will know that the "Booster" killed me, and the "Elm Fork River Band" will have to find another Banjo player for their Gig on the 8th.

Death, after all, is Nature's way of telling you to slow down.
So, because it didn’t happen to you that means it’s not happening to anyone else?
 

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
Actually, Jones is informative and you might know that if you took time to actually listen. His guests may tell you things you need to know that is ignored in other media sources supporting the vaccine fascist agenda. Attacking the program is ignoring the information presented. It is a dodge.
I posted 2 years ago March about the gain of function research he funded. He lost permission to fund here and really did not see "gain of function" phrase used anywhere. it was internal secret indirect government phrase. 2 years ago in February, Alex Jones interviewed a scientist who had a source in China that said virus came from Wuhan lab and not wet market.

I never heard of that interview and that it was posted on Natural News which our alpha Gateway Pundit hater keeps tell us we use as a source. I had never heard of Natural News. They have a lot that left wing Fake news can't touch.
 
Top