Biblical Hermeneutics

[Roger Thornhill]

No. One should rather take several factors into account at the same time.



I don't keep a mental list but here is what comes to mind.

At Isaiah 44:6, WHOSE redeemer according to the grammar?

I was looking for an example of something that was truly ungrammatical, not ambiguous.

My OP does not comment on ambiguity.

 

[Our Lord's God]

I was looking for an example of something that was truly ungrammatical, not ambiguous.

My OP does not comment on ambiguity.

The grammar is ambiguous?

 

[YeshuaFan]

The most objective tool for Biblical Hermeneutics is grammar. Within this large category exists some very basic axioms that are agreed upon by most everyone.

These should form the foundation of the biblical exegesis of any text.

Arguments based on these axioms must be challenged by other axioms. Here are some things that should not be considered effective against axioms.

One's view of the “context.”
Mere statistics.
Metaphorical interpretations.
Philosophy.

My two cents.

Comments?

Context one of the most important factors!

 

[Our Lord's God]

Context one of the most important factors!

Honesty - a more important factor.

 

[YeshuaFan]

Honesty - a more important factor.

Application probably most unused one!

 

[Roger Thornhill]

Context one of the most important factors!

Thanks for your opinion. Can you give me an example where context forces an ungrammatical rendering?

 

[Roger Thornhill]

The grammar is ambiguous?

You did not specify a problem, and I did not research it. Care to explain what you see as an issue?

 

[YeshuaFan]

Thanks for your opinion. Can you give me an example where context forces an ungrammatical rendering?

when some try to understand what it means for all and for the World in the NT!

 

[Roger Thornhill]

when some try to understand what it means for all and for the World in the NT!

That is an interpretation, not an issue of an ungrammatical rendering.