
Read and Share Twitter Threads easily!
Thread Reader helps you read and share the best of Twitter Threads

Straight facts from an actual OB/Gyn
In this case imo, since the mother is sick the abortion is justified. Where the mother and the child are not sick the abortion is justified.![]()
Read and Share Twitter Threads easily!
Thread Reader helps you read and share the best of Twitter Threadsthreadreaderapp.com
Straight facts from an actual OB/Gyn
That is exactly our point. The welfare of the mother is paramount.In this case imo, since the mother is sick the abortion is justified. Where the mother and the child are not sick the abortion is justified.
Otherwise what was your point?
Typo that should have been where the mother and child are NOT sick the abortion is not justified. Obvioisly, otherwise the issue of sickness isnt relevantThat is exactly our point. The welfare of the mother is paramount.
Ok so they rationalize their killing.In this case imo, since the mother is sick the abortion is justified. Where the mother and the child are not sick the abortion is justified.
Otherwise what was your point?
I (and most other Christians) don't object to an abortion to save the life of the mother. Any other reason is a group of 'convenient excuses' and murder.![]()
Read and Share Twitter Threads easily!
Thread Reader helps you read and share the best of Twitter Threadsthreadreaderapp.com
Straight facts from an actual OB/Gyn
He didn't have one. He just wants us feel bad for our firm abhorrence of abattoirs.In this case imo, since the mother is sick the abortion is justified. Where the mother and the child are not sick the abortion is justified.
Otherwise what was your point?
Nope. Even that is disputable if you look at issues of regret for many women who have an abortion. No, what is paramount to you is your ideology.That is exactly our point. The welfare of the mother is paramount.
The woke ideology he has bought into is a feelings based ideology and objects to facts which dont care about it.He didn't have one. He just wants us feel bad for our firm abhorrence of abattoirs.
The 'ideology' is that the rights of the woman to her own body are paramount.Nope. Even that is disputable if you look at issues of regret for many women who have an abortion. No, what is paramount to you is your ideology.
Utter nonsense. A child in the womb is not subject to an evil woman and man, but to God only.The 'ideology' is that the rights of the woman to her own body are paramount.
So you support the sufferring or had you chosen not to address the point put to you?The 'ideology' is that the rights of the woman to her own body are paramount.
Edit
A tiny percentage of a big number. And much less than 25%.TINY PERCENTAGE? Millions per year!!!!
Nope. According to me, God doesn't exist, do has nothing to do with it. According to the poster I was writing to, the responsibility for what happens to unborn children is entirely God's. If you don't like that, take it up with her.And let's elaborate on your horribly evil and disgusting logic:
(1). Miscarriages occur.
(2). According to you, God causes miscarriages.
Entirely unrelated. Yes, I do think that abortion should be available to any woman who wants it, but that has nothing to do with God, since he doesn't exist.(3). Therefore it should be OK for us to kill unborn babies.
I don't. See above. Do you think that what happens to people is controlled by or in the hands of God? Some bereaved parents are comforted by the thought that their child has been taken by God. Personally, I don't believe it.(4). Infants also die.
(5). To be consistent with your (2) above, you think God causes infant mortality.
That's some weird logic you have there.(6). Therefore it should be OK to "electively" kill infants.
With a clear conscience.How do you sleep at night?
A tiny percentage of a big number. And much less than 25%.
Nope. According to me, God doesn't exist, do has nothing to do with it.
According to the poster I was writing to, the responsibility for what happens to unborn children is entirely God's.
I don't. See above. Do you think that what happens to people is controlled by or in the hands of God?
With a clear conscience.
I didn't. I responded to someone else who did. Complain to them.So you don't really think God kills unborn babies, you just want people to be able to kill unborn babies. So why did you bring God up?
On the contrary, I care very much. That's why I am here arguing the case for abortion to be freely available to any woman who wants it, within legal limits of course.But you don't think so. You know that humans are responsible for the ones they kill, but you don't care.
When they do so legally, the controls are in the hands of legislators, and ultimately voters. You could consult the result of the recent referendum in Ireland as an example.No, when people are hired to slaughter unborn children, the controls are in the hands of the killers.
Pathetic.I'll bet Putin does too.
On the contrary, I care very much. That's why I am here arguing the case for abortion to be freely available to any woman who wants it,
Depends. Firstly, since its the woman's offspring, I would argue that you most certainly dont care about the woman. Secondly it was the offspring that stiggy wiggy pointed out you don't care about, not the woman.On the contrary, I care very much. That's why I am here arguing the case for abortion to be freely available to any woman who wants it, within legal limits of course.
Murder always bothers me, especially when it is done to the most vulnerable among us.Well God is prepared to abort around 25% of them without any interference from human beings, so the tiny percentage of elective abortions carried out by people shouldn't bother you.
"Tiny percentage"? That's some top shelf idiocy right thereWell God is prepared to abort around 25% of them without any interference from human beings, so the tiny percentage of elective abortions carried out by people shouldn't bother you.