Cannot take you seriouslySorry about your luck then.
Cannot take you seriouslySorry about your luck then.
There is a hollow haughtiness from KJVOs in an attempt to hide the fact they have zero scripture to support KJVOism.
Cannot take you seriously
Wrong again. Those doctrines can be demonstrated using verses. You have abandoned trying to prove KJVOism from scripture and you really don‘t care that you can’t.Not to mention the trinity, baptism by immersion, the deity of the Holy Ghost, the deity of Christ, and a host of other truths that aren't expressed, using terms nKJVOs demand ... right?
You have demonstrated that you do not use scripture correctly.Suit yourself.
The above statement shows the folly of eschewing a study of the biblical language or not taking advantage of those who have. One who sees English as the end all and be all is lost in understanding John 8:58. As a result of such ignorance they can make a state such as seen above.Not to mention the trinity, baptism by immersion, the deity of the Holy Ghost, the deity of Christ, and a host of other truths that aren't expressed, using terms nKJVOs demand ... right?
Sorry about your luck then.
Show us from the scriptures.Not to mention the trinity, baptism by immersion, the deity of the Holy Ghost, the deity of Christ, and a host of other truths that aren't expressed, using terms nKJVOs demand ... right?
The KJV translators believed in paedobaptism. They were also Calvinist's and held to the 39 articles of the church of England.
That is the most honest thing you ever wrote.I don't know.
That is the most honest thing you ever wrote.
First off you had not stopped posting. So that comment did not make a lick of sense.Interesting how ... when I stop posting ... you guys' momentum just goes on and on.
What's driving your anger?
No, you don't want to know. The same people who translated the KJV believed in paedobaptism. Limited atonement, unconditional election, irresistible grace, perseverance of the Saints.That's their problem.
Perhaps they read what they wrote later and corrected themselves?
I don't know.
People who get their information from men instead of God's word. Brain washing describes this succinctly.Interesting how ... when I stop posting ... you guys' momentum just goes on and on.
What's driving your anger?
The same people who translated the KJV believed in paedobaptism. Limited atonement, unconditional election, irresistible grace, perseverance of the Saints.
Did they take those beliefs to the grave with them? or did they repent?
There is no known evidence that they repented and turned from their incorrect Church of England doctrines and that they repented for their terrible persecution and torture of people for their beliefs. They had not repented at the time of their involvement in the making of the KJV.
But that was reported. You are engaging in wishful thinkingHow do you know?
Didn't Saul of Tarsus, one of God's hand-picked secretaries, have a life changing experience before he started writing Scripture?
Ditto for Matthew, Peter, James, and John?
Here we find the poster desperately floundering as he comes to the knowledge that the man who translated the KJV held doctrinal positions he opposes. So he puts forward the ridiculous idea that everyone of them secretly changed their positions.How do you know?
Didn't Saul of Tarsus, one of God's hand-picked secretaries, have a life changing experience before he started writing Scripture?
Ditto for Matthew, Peter, James, and John?
From their own actions and from their own writings and from histories of that period of time.How do you know?