CDC Warns of Strokes with Pfeizer Booster

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that data collected on the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine merits an investigation into potential stroke risks for people aged 65 and older. (article)

I say, if you're over 65, go for it....get the boosters and test it out for yourself.
Actually, the CDC is saying that the data collected from one source (VSD) meets the criteria for additional investigation. Data from other sources does not show any link as of yet.
Only one of several indicators hints at a possible link, but that's enough for some to declare, 'Yes, Virginia, there is a link!'.
 
Actually, the CDC is saying that the data collected from one source (VSD) meets the criteria for additional investigation. Data from other sources does not show any link as of yet.
Only one of several indicators hints at a possible link, but that's enough for some to declare, 'Yes, Virginia, there is a link!'.
They were pretty mich forced into doing something about the "check engine light" as their lies have been exposed and are being exposed.
 
The perfectly safe vaccine turns out to be a killer.


Why do you have to filter your information through a right-wing propaganda site that we all know will spin it?

CDC:

“Furthermore, it is important to note that, to date, no other safety systems have shown a similar signal and multiple subsequent analyses have not validated this signal:

A large study of updated (bivalent) vaccines (from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database revealed no increased risk of ischemic stroke
A preliminary study using the Veterans Affairs database did not indicate an increased risk of ischemic stroke following an updated (bivalent) vaccine
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) managed by CDC and FDA has not seen an increase in reporting of ischemic strokes following the updated (bivalent) vaccine
Pfizer-BioNTech’s global safety database has not indicated a signal for ischemic stroke with the updated (bivalent) vaccine
Other countries have not observed an increased risk for ischemic stroke with updated (bivalent) vaccines
Although the totality of the data currently suggests that it is very unlikely that the signal in VSD represents a true clinical risk, we believe it is important to share this information with the public”
 

U.S. FDA, CDC see early signal of possible Pfizer bivalent COVID shot link to stroke​

 
Actually, the CDC is saying that the data collected from one source (VSD) meets the criteria for additional investigation. Data from other sources does not show any link as of yet.
Only one of several indicators hints at a possible link, but that's enough for some to declare, 'Yes, Virginia, there is a link!'.
The links have been around since before the jab was introduced...you do know that?
 
The links have been around since before the jab was introduced...you do know that?
Well, yes, I do know that. In a responsible world, most health authorities track the available data to discover possible, unknown side-effects from any drug on the market. Those systems are continually being refined.
 
Well, yes, I do know that. In a responsible world, most health authorities track the available data to discover possible, unknown side-effects from any drug on the market. Those systems are continually being refined.
Then why didn't the $top it 2 years ago if they knew of the harmful effect the jab will have on the population?
 
Then why didn't the $top it 2 years ago if they knew of the harmful effect the jab will have on the population?
Stop what? Reviewing the data? Should they just listen to you and your 'sources'? Whether you believe it or not, even the obvious stupidity you put forth here is included in the data being reviewed. What does it tell you when your massive die-off has, only now, registered in sufficient numbers to be noted for further study?
 
Stop what? Reviewing the data? Should they just listen to you and your 'sources'? Whether you believe it or not, even the obvious stupidity you put forth here is included in the data being reviewed. What does it tell you when your massive die-off has, only now, registered in sufficient numbers to be noted for further study?
What will the numbers be 2 years from now? Will you be amongst them?
 
Back
Top