Chew Toy Apologetic*

[DaGeo]

As I am frequently showing, the truth that Temujin upholds changes

EXACTLY‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️

 

[DaGeo]

You would know.

Yes, that’s why I keep pointing out your errors‼️‼️😂🤣😇

Physician, heal thyself.

Truth doesn't change. Our understanding of what is true does change. Relying on the understanding of the truth held by goat herders of the Bronze Age, while denying any change in understanding, is the ultimate in psychological denial.

Right, when you can’t refute then ad hominem works just as good

You are welcome. It amuses me to post here and unlike some, I feel that I can amuse myself at your expense without causing myself psychological damage. That is a very back-handed compliment.

I enjoy reading your posts because they show how desperate you are at denying what you know is true.

You must be an undercover anti-atheist Buddhist disguised as an atheist to make atheist responses look even more silly

Don’t worry, you can’t make atheist’s responses more silly

 

[Temujin]

Right, when you can’t refute then ad hominem works just as good

Says the man who hasn't even attempted to refute a single post on these forums. In your case , your statement here is completely accurate, but you shouldn't judge others as you judge yourself.

I enjoy reading your posts because they show how desperate you are at denying what you know is true.

Your ability at mind reading matches your ability to engage in normal debate in a civilised manner. Total failure, in other words.

You must be an undercover anti-atheist Buddhist disguised as an atheist to make atheist responses look even more silly

Don’t worry, you can’t make atheist’s responses more silly

Insofar as my responses are silly, and I leave it to others whose judgement I value more than yours (that is virtually everybody) to make that call, they are silly due to the raw material I have to work with, your posts. It is difficult to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

 

[BMS]

Says the man who hasn't even attempted to refute a single post on these forums. In your case , your statement here is completely accurate, but you shouldn't judge others as you judge yourself.

Your ability at mind reading matches your ability to engage in normal debate in a civilised manner. Total failure, in other words.

Insofar as my responses are silly, and I leave it to others whose judgement I value more than yours (that is virtually everybody) to make that call, they are silly due to the raw material I have to work with, your posts. It is difficult to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

Says the poster who cant acknowledge the difference between a man and a woman.

 

[mikeT]

Says the poster who cant acknowledge the difference between a man and a woman.

Your obsession with gender politics is tiresome, embarrassing and off-topic. Take it elsewhere, or you'll be reported for spamming.

 

[BMS]

Your obsession with gender politics is tiresome, embarrassing and off-topic. Take it elsewhere, or you'll be reported for spamming.

Says the poster who is obsessed with gender when other posters havent mentioned it. Read what is written not what you image to have been written. And don't try bullying me, it only reveals the nature of your spirit

 

[DaGeo]

Says the man who hasn't even attempted to refute a single post on these forums. In your case , your statement here is completely accurate, but you shouldn't judge others as you judge yourself.

You have yet to figure out that it’s impossible to refute your dense nonsense.

One excellent poster once said, nonsense is any “line of argument that is based on either wrong assumptions or wrong inferences (or both), and this wrongness can be easily demonstrated, based on common-knowledge”

So whenever you speak from your baseless temujin nonsense remember this: even everyday simple common knowledge refutes you. In fact, when one side of your mouth speaks about one thing the other side contradicts

It’s just been fascinating watching you self-destruct every time you say something.

Your ability at mind reading matches your ability to engage in normal debate in a civilised manner. Total failure, in other words.

Stop accusing me of saying you have a mind. I didn’t say that‼️😂😂🤣

Insofar as my responses are silly, and I leave it to others whose judgement I value more than yours (that is virtually everybody) to make that call, they are silly due to the raw material I have to work with, your posts. It is difficult to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

I appreciate you for not including me in a group of gullibles

 

[mikeT]

You have yet to figure out that it’s impossible to refute your dense nonsense.

It's good that you can admit when you're unable to refute an argument. Very adult of you.

 

[BMS]

It's good that you can admit when you're unable to refute an argument. Very adult of you.

The point was you guys cant.. nor does this post of yours.
Observable reality exposes much of what you claim as false. That was the point, and it is true

 

[Temujin]

The point was you guys cant.. nor does this post of yours.
Observable reality exposes much of what you claim as false. That was the point, and it is true

It is not possible to observe reality though the Bible. The Bible is a book. It is opaque, in every sense. Try to look through it and all you see is the Bible. You are blind to what you call observable reality. You cannot see it.

 

[BMS]

It is not possible to observe reality though the Bible. The Bible is a book. It is opaque, in every sense. Try to look through it and all you see is the Bible. You are blind to what you call observable reality. You cannot see it.

This is the secular part of the forum so you should be able to defend a secular position, but often you cant.

 

[DaGeo]

It's good that you can admit when you're unable to refute an argument. Very adult of you.

Mikey, long time no read‼️ Good to see you’re on the line‼️

Yep, that’s right. Adults realize nonsense is beyond refutation. All that’s left to do is help people identify it.

Here’s how that works.

Suppose someone offers something tantamount to, “blah blah blah”. (eg evolution is scientific)
How would you refute that kinda nonsense? And don’t tell me you would just believe it‼️😳

 

[Eightcrackers]

Your obsession with gender politics is tiresome, embarrassing and off-topic. Take it elsewhere, or you'll be reported for spamming.

When I use "woman", I get

"How do you define woman?"

When I use "person", I get

"Why did you use person instead of woman?"


So I used Ignore.

 

[BMS]

When I use "woman", I get

"How do you define woman?"

When I use "person", I get

"Why did you use person instead of woman?"


So I used Ignore.

When we ask the question what is a woman all we get is a refusal to answer.
So that just leaves the question what is a woman. Its important because you include a man who calls himself a 'transwoman' as a woman, and he isnt and cant get pregnant.
Since we cant agree on what a woman is, we discuss anything that relates to a woman.

 

[Temujin]

When I use "woman", I get

"How do you define woman?"

When I use "person", I get

"Why did you use person instead of woman?"


So I used Ignore.

I use Ignore too, but for a slightly different reason. And I frequently ignore the Ignore, if you see what I mean. But it does relieve the SIWOTI symptoms somewhat.

 

[BMS]

I use Ignore too, but for a slightly different reason. And I frequently ignore the Ignore, if you see what I mean. But it does relieve the SIWOTI symptoms somewhat.

I dont use the ignore ever, but I do insist posters address issues and I do insist posters dont keep.pushing what they refsue to address, or lecturing us on what they cant and wont justify.
what is a woman Temujin?

 

[shnarkle]

It is in her body, so she should have the choice as to whether or not it remains there.

So you're claiming it's a private property rights issue. If its in her house, the same logic would apply. She can kill any uninvited guests who appear in her home.

The problem is that she not only invited the person into her home, she did so without their consent. She place the person in her home, then decided that because this person cannot leave of their own accord, she will just kill it.

Killing people whether it's legal or not is not a great precedent to set especially when one objectifies people and treats them as property.

 

[BMS]

So you're claiming it's a private property rights issue. If its in her house, the same logic would apply. She can kill any uninvited guests who appear in her home.

The problem is that she not only invited the person into her home, she did so without their consent. She place the person in her home, then decided that because this person cannot leave of their own accord, she will just kill it.

Killing people whether it's legal or not is not a great precedent to set especially when one objectifies people and treats them as property.

This is absolutely spot on. Thank you shnarkle

 

[DaGeo]

I use Ignore too, but for a slightly different reason. And I frequently ignore the Ignore, if you see what I mean. But it does relieve the SIWOTI symptoms somewhat.

You’re right, the truth is a heavy haul, especially when you already drag around a massive load of misinformation

 

[Temujin]

You’re right, the truth is a heavy haul, especially when you already drag around a massive load of misinformation

I'm sure this means something to you. It has no relevance to the post I made, so I will just leave it there for us all to laugh at.