Have you heard of Dunning-Kruger?
Yes, I would very much attribute that to gender ideologues.
A biological reality that no one, including myself disputes. What it is not is a sociological reality, a political reality or a medical reality. Do you realise that by claiming that all human life is driven by biology, you are denying religion?
So you cant have a sociological construct such as gender identity that denies the reality of biological sex and then say you affirm biological sex. Its a contradiction. Furthermore if you did accept the reality of biological sex, then you wouldnt be proposing gender identity lies, which I don't do, every time I mention them!
Sadly for you, the false ideology is yours. Gender identity
Let me stop you there. What ideology? I do biological sex which you have just said you affirm, now you seem to be saying its false. Why are you contradicting yourself?
I do not deny the reality of biological sex.
Ok so man who calls himself a 'transwoman' is a man and not a 'transwoman'? Or do you deny it? You dont know what you are talking about chap, you have been deluded by mentally deficient ideologies
I deny that everything in human existence is driven by biological sex.
So do I, what you deny is biological sex as soon as you invoke gender identity ideology
There is no such thing as "woke activism".
Yes there is, it is the ideology you hold and you demonstrate it almost every post
It is just a pathetic dog whistle from people who cannot stand the thought that people who actually study biology, that is, biologists, don't accept the kindergarten version of sex that you refuse to let go of.
No so, the studies you guys have cited all contain the woke imaginary concepts and wording.
roject nuttie is a bunch of pathetic, stupid losers who have sold their brains in return for religious platitudes.
Ok so you have just said you affirmed biological sex, and now you call the signaturies of Project Nettie such as a Professor of Genetics at University College London, who has MBChB and PhD Genetics, a loser? Nope.
Why should anyone lie about their sex? Why should anyone be concerned if they do?
You tell me. Why should anyone lie about anything? So you think thieves are people who identify as thieves or people who steal?
Why aren't you 22 years old?
Why do you need to tell the difference?
Because otherwise when you say tall short and in between we have no idea what you mean by tall or short.
Why is this so important to you?
Because we dont know what you mean
Why are you so obsessed with other people's genitalia?
We aren't, you are, everyone is either male and female or intersex yet everytime I mentioned it you ignored it. Besides, biological sex is chromosomes anatomy and genitalia, not just genitalia. But genitalia are important when discussing abortion, which is the thread topic, because only the woman, the adult female, has the female genitalia.
The tide is not turning. You are being swept away and the sooner the better. Good businesses care about the health and welfare of their staff. Good governments care about the health and welfare of their citizens. That is why your discriminatory idiocies are so out of touch.
Well its the examples I have given verses your claim
I have said as much. What you don't realise is that as well as being male, female or intersex, they may be trans or non-binary.
They arent. What sex is trans? What sex is non-binary? People not identifying with what they are doesnt change what they are, it just means they dont recognise the reality of what they are. What someone is must be a part of who someone is.
Very, very few people claim that trans people do not exist.
All people are male, female or intersex, have I left anyone out?
All those that do are totally deluded and blind to reality.
All people are male, female or intersex, though a few have a dysphoria with their sex. Most people don't do gender identity which denies the sex a person is. You are peddling deluded propaganda.
I get it but it was a question to you. Why arent you 22 years old? If an anorexic can identify as fat, a 6'7 man identify as shorter than a 5'7" man, and a man identify as a woman, who knows what is what? The question is why do you abandon observable reality and common language when it comes to biological sex. Something badly perverted in the thinking. So why dont you get it?
in what way? All people are male, female or intersex, what is confusing you?
no not wrong, women have female anatomy and men have male anatomy. A woman who calls herself a 'transman' is a woman and not a 'transman' because she has female anatomy. You are denying biological sex.
They may have female anatomy,
Then they are women.
but if they have transitioned,
Not possible, sex is immutable. You are confused.
I know it is mentally deficient not to "do" gender identity.
On the contrary, as I have shown gender identity is mentally deficient, and its no surprise therefore most here recognise it as the lie it is.
No one cares whether you "do" gender identity.
Of course they do, most on this forum. what sort of a delude imaginary world do you live in?
None of this impacts on gender identity.
I dont do gender identity as it is the lie that denies biological sex. I do biological sex which is quantifiable evidence base reality that applies to everyone, not some imaginary social construct that most people reject
If you realise it is a lie to deny gender identity, then stop doing it.
Gender Identity is a lie.
Not relevant to gender identity.
I dont do gender identity as it is a lie, however the biological sex is observable evidence based reality, something neither of us can deny.
A few people, may agree with you,
Most do. I mean I gave you the nettie project with hundreds of scientists, physcologists and medical professional and you called them nutters and loosers. Naah
Which you can neither quantify nor produce evidence for.
Well you said you affirmed biological sex and now you say it isnt evidence. You have no idea what you are talking about.
Unblock your mind, you are increasingly unable to tell reality from fantasy and increasingly unable to communicate with people.