Can you prove it ?Maybe you're not interpreting that passage correctly.
Could that be possible?
Can you prove it ?Maybe you're not interpreting that passage correctly.
Could that be possible?
Can you prove it ?Theo1689 said:
Maybe you're not interpreting that passage correctly.
Could that be possible?
As I questioned can you prove me wrong regarding what I posted here ?Okay, so we're going to play this game, are we?
Can you prove your opinion is infallible?
As I questioned can you prove me wrong regarding what I posted here ?
You asking questions does not do it
Give it upSorry, I don't fall for you fallaciously shifting the burden of proof.
YOU are the one who needs to "prove yourself" RIGHT.
And so far, you haven't done so.
Give it up
You never address anything and play this game constantly
either address the verse or don't
1 Tim. 2:3–6 —KJV
“For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
Lol you may as well forget about him proving his points with scripture. He put that burden on you with the quicknessSorry, I don't fall for you fallaciously shifting the burden of proof.
YOU are the one who needs to "prove yourself" RIGHT.
And so far, you haven't done so.
I know, right?Lol you may as well forget about him proving his points with scripture. He put that burden on you with the quickness
More fluffI believe the passage.
Why don't you?
More fluff
You are unable to prove I don't believe the passage
or prove my interpretation false
1 Tim. 2:3–6 —KJV
“For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
I know, right?
He quotes a verse that we accept and believe.
He offers no interpretation.
He offers no exegesis.
He simply says, "This verse contradicts Calvinism", even though it is very clear that it doesn't.
And he refuses to even ATTEMPT to justify his false claims.
sorry this has been addressed many times previously
You posted nothing that proves me wrong so you have no grounds at all for claiming it false
1 Tim. 2:3–6 —KJV
“For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
What is good and acceptable in the sight of God who wills all men to be saved
1 Tim. 2:1–2 —KJV
“¶ I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men;
For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.”
can you claim all men means elect men only ?
Some men ?
Are all that are in authority all elect
All kings All elect
How would Timothy's hearer's understand the term ?
How would they know who to pray for if not all in the category ?
Do you imagine the Holy Spirit could not have inspired Timothy to say some or elect if that is what he meant
finally Timothy notes
1 Tim. 2:6 —KJV
“Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.”
Four times He uses the term all
Sorry scripture does not say some and it does not say the electYou posted nothing that proves Calvinism wrong.
So why the double standard?
And all the Calvinists said, "Amen!"
And all the Calvinists said, "Amen!"
Where did I make any of those claims?
Why don't you tell us what YOU think it means?
Or are you too afraid to share your interpretation?
Why don't you ask them?
You see, this is the fallacy.
No matter what I say, you will say I'm wrong, and you will try to claim that YOU know what people 2000 years ago understood by the Scriptures, yet there is no way for you to prove yourself right.
Do YOU imagine that the Holy Spirit could not have inspired Timothy to say "every single individual", if THAT is what he meant?
And all the Calvinists said, "Amen!"
Since you offer no interpretation, but only quote Scripture, I can only agree with the Scripture.
Have a nice day!![]()
Sorry scripture does not say some and it does not say the elect
can you claim all men means elect men only ?
Some men ?
No answer
Are all that are in authority all elect
no answer
All kings All elect
No answer
How would Timothy's hearer's understand the term ?
No answer
Do you imagine the Holy Spirit could not have inspired Timothy to say some or elect if that is what he meant
No answer
finally Timothy notes
1 Tim. 2:6 —KJV
“Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.”
Four times He uses the term all
Yes the elect are found in all classes of men. Whenever scripture is talking about men as being objects of the death of Christ it's limited to the Sheep or Elect or the Church.Sorry scripture does not say some and it does not say the elect
Why do you not address a singlev question asked
1 Tim. 2:1–2 —KJV
“¶ I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men;
For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.”
can you claim all men means elect men only ?
No answer
Some men ?
No answer
Are all that are in authority all elect
no answer
All kings All elect
No answer
How would Timothy's hearer's understand the term ?
No answer
How would they know who to pray for if not all in the category ?
Do you imagine the Holy Spirit could not have inspired Timothy to say some or elect if that is what he meant
No answer
finally Timothy notes
1 Tim. 2:6 —KJV
“Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.”
Four times He uses the term all
All men cannot be limited to just electYes the elect are found in all classes of men. Whenever scripture is talking about men as being objects of the death of Christ it's limited to the Sheep or Elect or the Church.
Yes limited to the Sheep or Elect or the Church the body of ChristAll men cannot be limited to just elect
All men is not some men
And the word elect does not appear in the passage
1 Tim. 2:1–6 —KJV
“¶ I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men;
For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.
For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.”
Do you not tire of ignoring the word of GodYes limited to the Sheep or Elect or the Church the body of Christ