Electric Skeptic
Well-known member
Yes, you are.
No, you're not.
You have yet to show anything irrational in anything I've said.
Still waiting for you to demonstrate the existence of your god.
Clarifying Question
- Thread starter radvermin
- Start date
Still waiting for you to demonstrate the existence of your god.
Temujin
Well-known member
Fail. If your argument against abortion rests on the existence of God, then you must first demonstrate the existence of God. Not just any god, but your particular one. Good luck with that.
Meanwhile in the real world, there are sincere Christians who support abortion rights, who have abortions and who carry out abortions, just as there are atheists who are pro-life. Abortion is not a religious issue. You personally may have come to your own position for religious reasons, but that doesn't mean that everyone else thinks the same way. Something for which we can all be thankful.
So the lesson here is, dont focus on what different people claim but on evidence.
In what way?
Like what. You have to give specific evidence and reasoning, and even then who knows what you are imagining
Most of your posts remain rationally incoherent and this post is no exception.
In logic, you, the denier, are required to provide the burden of proof for your unfounded psychological denialGod.
But since you’re not in the habit of producing logical arguments, Edit per mod
There are only fake Christians in support of abortion. The Bible, is replete with condemnation for child killers who offer up their own posterity as a sacrifice convenience and wanton pleasure.
You obviously feel the need to force everyone to think the same as you, that’s why you refuse my position.
If I concede my position as one of many possibilities, then you would consider my position legitimate.
Last edited by a moderator:
No doubt you feel you’re being attacked because your ideas are so fragile
If denying things helps, then go for it
Like I said above, if denying things helps, then by all means, go for it
If denying realities that are uncomfortable helps you cope, that’s your privilege.
Electric Skeptic
Well-known member
Ad hominem, insult, not interested.
Wrong again. You posit the existence of a god; the burden is entirely yours.
Ad hominem, insult, not interested.
You do not get to determine who are 'real' and who are 'fake' Christians. Those Christians who support women's right to abort are just as much a Christian as you are.
Ad hominem, false. I refuse your position because you cannot support it.
I do not know what it means to consider a position 'legitimate'. I consider the position of Christians to be irrational as it is unsupported.
Ad hominem, insult, not interested.
Denying things neither helps nor hinders. Denying things that are unsupported is the way rational people behave.
Denying things neither helps nor hinders. Denying things that are unsupported is the way rational people behave.
Denying things neither helps nor hinders. Denying things that are unsupported is the way rational people behave.
Its a debate. Bad luck. You dont get to dictate who posts what and when.
When you post please post some evidence and reasoning instead of just Temujin's opinion
Abortion isnt justified because a woman owns her body and so does her offspring which she helped create.
Temujin
Well-known member
Laughable nonsense. You assert firstly that God exists and secondly that atheists don't exist. You don't provide any evidence for either of these assertions, resting your entire argument on theses two planks; one rotten the other imaginary. It is for you to establish your own argument. Making outrageously stupid assertions then demanding that others refute them, is just a recipe for contempt. You have achieved that, at least.
Since you are not capable of producing any arguments at all, let alone logical ones, this remark is dismissed as the pathetic attempt at diversion that it is.
And your authority to decide that any Christian who disagrees with you is "fake" rests on what exactly? Your personal opinion and interpretation of the Bible is more authoritative, why precisely?
But nothing about abortion.
Hilarious. You are practising your insults in the mirror again.
What gives legitimacy to a position is some semblance of logic or evidence that it has credibility. You tell other people what they think, in effect calling them liars when they say they do not believe in your God. There is no logic or evidence that supports such a position. Which is why you have made no attempt to produce any.
Temujin
Well-known member
Says the person who is posting pure babble, no opinion or evidence, just a lazy "What did you say? What do you mean? " because you are too idle to read the conversation that precedes your interjection.
This is an opinion board. You can post what you like, within the rules, as can I. If you want to control what I post, become a Mod.
Eightcrackers
Well-known member
This poster thinks that everybody already knows that their god exists, remember.
Thats just your opinion. I can comment on whatever post I want. As I have suggested to you before, when you post provide evidence and reasoning rather than just your opinion.
Furthernore as to your last post to DaGeo, I should look at what the Bible says rather what different people might claim about it, and that also goes for what a women actually is rather than what some might claim.
Electric Skeptic
Well-known member
I don't think he does. That's just his way of ignoring the onus on him to demonstrate (or evidence) the existence of his god.
Eightcrackers
Well-known member
Either way, no progress can be made.
Told you that months ago. If you cant identify correctly the woman, then you are not going to be able to talk about abortion.
Electric Skeptic
Well-known member
Sadly, no.