Reformedguy
Well-known member
Of course not. Your just to good. LOL . Again, for the slow amongst us, I was not asked.
Contra Calvinism
- Thread starter fltom
- Start date
Our Lord's God
Well-known member
For many, avoidance equates to success.
Theo1689
Well-known member
Is that why Chalcedon and Johnnybgood have just about every Calvinist on "ignore"?
For "avoidance" purposes?
Is that why you have avoided repling to a number of arguments?
I am asking now seeing as you saw fit to comment
How will you avoid an actual response now
Sketo
Well-known member
I am asking now, a 3rd time. Will you avoid again?
According to your view “immediately receive it with joy” would be considered the “choice” that prompts God to regenerate them correct?
So, in your view, when they “fall away” are they considered regenerate unbelievers at that point, or do they also become unregenerate again? Or did God just forget to regenerate them in the first place and that’s why they “fell away”? ??
Does your view teach that those “born of God” can become unborn of God?
…
According to your view “immediately receive it with joy” would be considered the “choice” that prompts God to regenerate them correct?
So, in your view, when they “fall away” are they considered regenerate unbelievers at that point, or do they also become unregenerate again? Or did God just forget to regenerate them in the first place and that’s why they “fell away”? ??
Does your view teach that those “born of God” can become unborn of God?
…
How does a someone who doesn't know God become a believer, what makes the ignorant of God believe?
Sketo
Well-known member
I believe the answer is found somewhere in…
“For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.” (1Co 1:18)
“but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called,… Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.” (1Co 1:23-24)
“And because of him you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, righteousness and sanctification and redemption,” (1Co 1:30)
…
I believe it starts with "believing". But who believes first?
Theo1689
Well-known member
I've replied to your arguments hundreds of times.
You simply falsely claim I haven't, and then falsely accuse me of running away.
I'm sorry, but unlike you, I actually value my time, and have better things to do than answer the same questions ten million times. So take that ugly chip off your shoulder and stop harassing me.
G
guest1
Guest
Hey stop harassing me ?
Reformedguy
Well-known member
Reso se to what? Nothing was addressed to me champ
I just did and you are dodging as usual
regarding the parable of the sower
Contra Calvinism
how can one believe if not regenerate
and
if regenerate how can one fall away
let we see men believe temporarily
you did not answer this
Thwere are argument you have never addressed and ran from
Like the use of the term especial as it appears in
1 Timothy 4:10 (KJV 1900) — 10 For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.
and BDAG
you quit the field when I posted this
2 Timothy 4:13 (KJV 1900) — 13 The cloke that I left at Troas with Carpus, when thou comest, bring with thee, and the books, but especially the parchments.
and you have never addressed
this either
John 12:47 (KJV 1900) — 47 And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.
according to the verse why does GFod not judge any unbeliever
and what then is relationship between any unbeliever and the world
Sorry but you did run away and you still run away to this date
you have not addressed either even once
preferring as you do above give excuses about your time and other reason to avoid a response
Reformedguy
Well-known member
Easy. The devils believe right? Are they saved or is it mere intellectual ascent to certain facts??
We ar not talking about devils but men
your theology holds men cannot believe unless regenerated
and once regenerated cannot fall awy
yet in the parable of the sower we see both
try again
you failed your last attempt
Theo1689
Well-known member
The BIBLE holds that.
The BIBLE holds that.
Only if you misinterpret it, which you must do.
First of all, we don't need to "try" anything, since you haven't disproven Calvinism.
Secondly, we don't need to prove anything, since nobody is forcing you to accept Calvinism. It's a free country, if you don't believe it, you don't have to believe it.
That's why it's accurate for me to point out your gigantic chip on your shoulder. You have no desire to accept Calvinism, but all you do is goad and harass people to try to "convince" you that it's true, just so you can go "Nuh-huh", insult them, and then falsely accuse them of "running away".
G
guest1
Guest
Yes more conflating, equivocating.
Sorry you provided no evidence to support that
Matthew 13:18–23 (ESV) — 18 “Hear then the parable of the sower: 19 When anyone hears the word of the kingdom and does not understand it, the evil one comes and snatches away what has been sown in his heart. This is what was sown along the path. 20 As for what was sown on rocky ground, this is the one who hears the word and immediately receives it with joy, 21 yet he has no root in himself, but endures for a while, and when tribulation or persecution arises on account of the word, immediately he falls away. 22 As for what was sown among thorns, this is the one who hears the word, but the cares of the world and the deceitfulness of riches choke the word, and it proves unfruitful. 23 As for what was sown on good soil, this is the one who hears the word and understands it. He indeed bears fruit and yields, in one case a hundredfold, in another sixty, and in another thirty.”
That addresses nothing Theo
and is nothing more than ad hominem in place of a scriptural response
Why is it you cannot mount a biblical counter argument?
The Calvinists here are consistently avoiding a biblical response to conflicts within their theology