Its been rebaptized into the Church under guise of word of faith!
What do Christian science believe?
Basically, denies sin and death, matter, life is an illusion , and that Jesus was a mere man who had the Christ mind/spirit! Denies hell, denies that Jesus died for sin, deny salvation, basically Christian mind science!What do Christian science believe?
Hey there!What do Christian science believe?
Yep. Pretty much sums it up. While I'd say more about it's cultic, heretical nature, I appreciate your objective assessment of Christian Science based on your observation, Whateverman. Pretty spot on.Hey there!
The only knowledge I have of it is how my great aunt/uncle behaved. They were both Christian Scientists, and their daughter (who eventually gave birth to my cousin) joined the Christian Science church. From the perspective of someone on the outside (aka. me), all three of them did their best to never give acknowledgement to pain or sickness; they believed doing so either caused or perpetuated sickness. Thinking good/happy thoughts was part of the focus, and to a little kid around the holidays at their house, all I saw was that they were cheerful people for the most part.
Not sappy or artificially happy; just optimistic, trying to keep a positive attitude, etc.
They were Christian in their beliefs, at least as far as I understood it up to my early teens. I wont make any claims about whether they were true Christians or not; they had a few crosses in their house and were pious without being obnoxious about it, etc. Basically, they seemed like normal, religious and well-meaning folks.
A side effect of this "positive attitude" is that they didn't see doctors very often. All three of them have had health problems that could have been controlled or healed by modern medicine. However, I came here just to explain what I saw, not to cast doubt on their beliefs.
Thanks Woody. This place can get pretty contentious, but I work to not contribute to it.Yep. Pretty much sums it up. While I'd say more about it's cultic, heretical nature, I appreciate your objective assessment of Christian Science based on your observation, Whateverman. Pretty spot on.
Yep. I get wrapped up in the tidal wave here myself. Good post.Thanks Woody. This place can get pretty contentious, but I work to not contribute to it.
I fail a lot.
Glad I managed to succeed here.
Still wish I could call you Big W...anything but "Whateverman." I know it's your callsign, but I feel like I'm dismissing my entire argument when I address you after making one.Yep. I get wrapped up in the tidal wave here myself. Good post.
"W" works fine, Woody. I just didn't like the way "Big W" sounded like it could be either friendly or mockery. Abbreviate my name however you need to,Still wish I could call you Big W...anything but "Whateverman." I know it's your callsign, but I feel like I'm dismissing my entire argument when I address you after making one.
"So, you see I'm right, Whateverman." See????
This is intentional on your part, and brilliant, I must admit.
Whatever, man.
Nah. I need to grow up and use your name. I appreciate your feedback a lot. That said, I'll probably settle on a nickname for you based on our interactions. Gotta get to know you a bit more first."W" works fine, Woody. I just didn't like the way "Big W" sounded like it could be either friendly or mockery. Abbreviate my name however you need to,
Its pretty much Gnostic version, as on ehas to accept that reality is an illusion, as no such things as real death, sin, hell!Yep. Pretty much sums it up. While I'd say more about it's cultic, heretical nature, I appreciate your objective assessment of Christian Science based on your observation, Whateverman. Pretty spot on.
Christian Science denies sin, salvation, hell, as all is just an illusion!Hey there!
The only knowledge I have of it is how my great aunt/uncle behaved. They were both Christian Scientists, and their daughter (who eventually gave birth to my cousin) joined the Christian Science church. From the perspective of someone on the outside (aka. me), all three of them did their best to never give acknowledgement to pain or sickness; they believed doing so either caused or perpetuated sickness. Thinking good/happy thoughts was part of the focus, and to a little kid around the holidays at their house, all I saw was that they were cheerful people for the most part.
Not sappy or artificially happy; just optimistic, trying to keep a positive attitude, etc.
They were Christian in their beliefs, at least as far as I understood it up to my early teens. I wont make any claims about whether they were true Christians or not; they had a few crosses in their house and were pious without being obnoxious about it, etc. Basically, they seemed like normal, religious and well-meaning folks.
A side effect of this "positive attitude" is that they didn't see doctors very often. All three of them have had health problems that could have been controlled or healed by modern medicine. However, I came here just to explain what I saw, not to cast doubt on their beliefs.
Well said. But we can call any heresy Gnosticism, New Age, or Christian Science--it's all Satanic.Its pretty much Gnostic version, as on ehas to accept that reality is an illusion, as no such things as real death, sin, hell!
Word of faith seems to be a mix of Gnosticism and Christian science!Well said. But we can call any heresy Gnosticism, New Age, or Christian Science--it's all Satanic.
Disagree. WoF is a mix of Gnosticism and spoiled American culture.Word of faith seems to be a mix of Gnosticism and Christian science!
I was raised as a Christian Scientist. There is nothing Christian about it. And nothing scientific. God is not a personal God and so you can't have a personal relation to Him. He is Divine Mind. And we are a reflection of Divine Mind. Now if you want to know what that is you would have to look in Mary Baker Eddy's book Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures. There she has a glossary of terms because she changes the meanings of everything. And none of it makes any sense. MBE is the founder and leader of CS though she is long dead. Their church services consist of a first and second reader. The first reader, always a man, reads the designated passages from the Bible. The second reader, always a woman, reads MBE's meaning for those scriptures.These readings are assigned in a quarterly that comes out every three months and cycle through the year, the same every year since the 1800's.Hey there!
The only knowledge I have of it is how my great aunt/uncle behaved. They were both Christian Scientists, and their daughter (who eventually gave birth to my cousin) joined the Christian Science church. From the perspective of someone on the outside (aka. me), all three of them did their best to never give acknowledgement to pain or sickness; they believed doing so either caused or perpetuated sickness. Thinking good/happy thoughts was part of the focus, and to a little kid around the holidays at their house, all I saw was that they were cheerful people for the most part.
Not sappy or artificially happy; just optimistic, trying to keep a positive attitude, etc.
They were Christian in their beliefs, at least as far as I understood it up to my early teens. I wont make any claims about whether they were true Christians or not; they had a few crosses in their house and were pious without being obnoxious about it, etc. Basically, they seemed like normal, religious and well-meaning folks.
A side effect of this "positive attitude" is that they didn't see doctors very often. All three of them have had health problems that could have been controlled or healed by modern medicine. However, I came here just to explain what I saw, not to cast doubt on their beliefs.
This is the first thing a CS is to memorize,What do Christian science believe?