Darwin's laws of "higgledy-piggledy" objective fantasy from the "convictions of a monkey’s mind"?

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
Others before me have noted the self-refuting nature of Darwinism, but it is worth remembering that the Cambrian explosion wasn’t Darwin’s only doubt. Intellects governed by Darwin’s "law of higgledy-piggledy," as the great astronomer John Herschel once called it, cannot speak with much conviction about anything. In a "higgledy-piggledy" world, what are the standards of objective truth for the "convictions of a monkey’s mind"?


Have monkeys found a cure for Wuhan Fru? Cancer?

The Fossil Thumpers have not recovered from the findings of the Cambrian Explosion which clobbered Chuck's gradualism fantasy.
 

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
"The pattern that we were told to find for the last 120 years does not exist," declared Niles Eldridge, a paleontologist from the American Museum of Natural History in New York.

Darwin was blowing smoke
 
Top