stiggy wiggy
Well-known member
Would that be having only two wives? Nope, just one. Try again.So you are a Mormon-lite.
Would that be having only two wives? Nope, just one. Try again.So you are a Mormon-lite.
Not a matter of wives. It's just that you'll believe just about anything they tell you and self-justify it with religious fervor and call that delusion some "experience" of God. Once you start that cycle, your one convincing argument away from the golden leaves and more woman trouble than you can handle. The only thing keeping you on the rails is that you've already chosen your delusion. Reality or other delusions need not apply. No room in the inn.Would that be having only two wives? Nope, just one. Try again.
Not a matter of wives. It's just that you'll believe just about anything they tell you
and self-justify it with religious fervor and call that delusion some "experience" of God. Once you start that cycle, your one convincing argument
Women are TROUBLE to you? Sorry to hear that. Are you gay?away from the golden leaves and more woman trouble than you can handle.
No room in the inn.
Because that's what evangelicals are supposed to do.What the hell makes you think I need to convince YOU of all people that I have had an encounter with God?
You've committed yourself to mental nonsense that protects itself from the encroachment of any reason.What's that mean?
Because that's what evangelicals are supposed to do.
What's that bit of idiotic rhetoric have to do with your stupid "no room at the inn" comment?You've committed yourself to mental nonsense that protects itself from the encroachment of any reason.
It has to do with the utterly stupid things you choose to believe crowding out normal thinking in your mind.What's that bit of idiotic rhetoric have to do with your stupid "no room at the inn" comment?
Idiotic. One does not "choose to believe" the reality of an experience. Did you choose to believe that you typed the moronic comment above?It has to do with the utterly stupid things you choose to believe crowding out normal thinking in your mind.
What was typed started in a mind and ended up in reality on the screen. The idiotic nonsense you believe just rattles around in your head like a loose marble causing you to declare stupid things that actually don't exist in reality. Comparisons of make believe mental states and things that actually happen in the world are about as moronic as it gets.Idiotic. One does not "choose to believe" the reality of an experience. Did you choose to believe that you typed the moronic comment above?
What was typed started in a mind and ended up in reality on the screen. The idiotic nonsense you believe just rattles around in your head like a loose marble causing you to declare stupid things that actually don't exist in reality. Comparisons of make believe mental states and things that actually happen in the world are about as moronic as it gets.
You are getting desperate. Your inner moron is the only thing being splashed on the screen when it is the God you experience that you should be able to display. You can't produce this experiential certainty of God can you. Your idiocy gets in the way every time. It is much stronger than the God you experienced.I can always count on you to imbecilically paint yourself into a rhetorical corner. That which appears "in reality on the screen" is your evidence for factuality, eh? Then get off your duff, hotshot, and put up on the screen your evidence for your lame speculation that my encounters with God are merely imagined figments of my mind. In other words prove that you are not imagining what I allegedly imagine.
You don't really think your posts through too well before rushing to that "post reply" button, now do you
Well, I would be shocked if God held me accountable as he has more abilities than me and does virtually nothing with them.Well then. Just as long as you say so.
It's going to excuse you from any and all culpability.
Isn't it nice to know that God won't actually hold you culpable for what you hear, and your choice?
Just because you are excluding yourself doesn't mean that God is incapable or unwilling to engage you on his terms.Well, I would be shocked if God held me accountable as he has more abilities than me and does virtually nothing with them.
For instance, if I found a cure for cancer and hid it, I'd be responsible for it. But God (assuming he exists and has the powers that Christians ascribe to him) has these cures but does absolutely nothing with them and is not responsible for it.
So, yes, I'd be curious how the judgment would go.
You have to carefully assess whether it is the truth or not before you swallow hook, line and sinker.... but that's not how it works does it Steve. You have to swallow, hook line and sinker first right?Just because you are excluding yourself doesn't mean that God is incapable or unwilling to engage you on his terms.
You have to choose whether you want to know the truth or not.
I've spent the past 15,935 days assessing the claims made in the bible.You have to carefully assess whether it is the truth or not before you swallow hook, line and sinker.... but that's not how it works does it Steve. You have to swallow, hook line and sinker first right?
Yes, truth is most important to me. That's why I'm not religious, because all religions, including Christianity, require that you believe their religion is the one true religion and their God is the one true God who wants to engage you.You have to choose whether you want to know the truth or not.
Matthew 21:22 If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer.”I've spent the past 15,935 days assessing the claims made in the bible.
But you swallowed it hook, line, and sinker before the study started right?I've spent the past 15,935 days assessing the claims made in the bible.
So, you're more than welcome to come do the same.
I'd encourage you to find another term to describe "religious."Yes, truth is most important to me. That's why I'm not religious, because all religions, including Christianity, require that you believe their religion is the one true religion and their God is the one true God who wants to engage you.
nope.But you swallowed it hook, line, and sinker before the study started right?
But it sounds like you already accepted God as real from the above. Or is this not the case, you were an atheist/agnostic? If so, this goes to my other question on how do I handle the other part of the conversation. You have me at the cusp of your experiment. I've read the bible tracts you gave (familiar with most of it anyway) and will read it again to keep it fresh for the experiment. But you need to answer how you handled God's side of the conversation if you were indeed an atheist or agnostic.nope.
I quit attending church at 11-12.
I lived life, and had numerous discussions with a variety of people, who had a variety of different beliefs (I lived in OC, in So. Cal, during the 70's, so it was quite bizarre).
I had a few friends who became Jesus people during that period. So, by the time I was 17, I was hearing it more, and more. I finally began seeing things take place which resulted in my no longer being able to ignore it. I decided to confront it head on, and instead of listening to people talk, I asked God myself. the goal being to silence it once and for all.
What I did not expect was for God to answer me.
It was that answer which changed the course of my life.
So.... swallow hook, line and sinker beforehand?
No.
That's the convenient excuse used by people who don't want to find out for themselves.