Nondenom40
Well-known member
No, it was a very narrow and correct stroke.WOW 🖼️🎨🖌️ with a broad fictitious stroke😞
No, it was a very narrow and correct stroke.WOW 🖼️🎨🖌️ with a broad fictitious stroke😞
narrow as in the few Catholics that you know personally?No, it was a very narrow and correct stroke.
Aside from the "role" that God gave her of birthing the prophesied Savior as being a notable exception, Mary did not stand apart from the crowd as Roman Catholicism continually tries to purport worldwide. Roman Catholicism encourages their religious group of followers that ascribe to their teachings, to erroneously think that Mary was some kind of Biblical superhuman - then and now. They put her graven images on pedestals instilling in the minds of their deceived followers their need to "look up" to her. It's obvious how disillusioned Roman Catholics are, but is Almighty God so easily impressed?She did have a role. And her role counteracted the role that Eve had in the downfall of man.
Narrow as in the topic i've responded to. You are paying attention right?narrow as in the few Catholics that you know personally?
Can you produce any Roman Catholic among the list of Biblical characters who belong among "God's greatest?"Can you produce any official teaching of the Catholic church throughout the centuries that instructs us to worship anyone but God alone?
This is what concerns me. How many Catholics have pushed Christ to the rear?Catholics push Jesus to the rear to elevate mary.
God used Mary to humiliate Satan. Mary humbled herself under the mighty hand of God and now God has exalted her in due time. Mary is now queen of heaven and a powerful intercessor for us. It is sad that Christians reject the role God has given her for us.The bible isn't silent on who did the undoing here. You ascribe it to Mary undoing what eve did and then call her the new eve. The BIBLE in Romans 5 ascribes this action to Jesus, comparing Him to Adam. And Jesus is called the last Adam. Your poor out of touch example of the trinity has nothing to do with what we are talking about. It has nothing to do with what name is or isn't in the bible. It has to do with an action. You suggest Mary did something the bible never even hints that she did. However, the bible isn't silent on who did this thing, and it's not Mary. It's Jesus. So yes, you're stripping something away from Him and handing it to a mere human. It's disgraceful.
The prior Pope gave Mary credit to marry to saving him from the shooter, and not Lord Jesus!Monkey say monkey do. There is probably not one statue of Mary that went unkissed by JPII as he passed by. As a matter of fact, he went out of his way to worship Mary. I would say that anyone asking would be hard pressed to find someone that would not agree with the statement that the pompous maximus is a role model for all rc's.You said yourself that It was necessary for salvation to believe in the Marian Dogmas.
Catholic News Agency------->"There are four dogmas stating Mary's personal relationship with God and her role in human salvation".
Why pray to a mere creature when we are to pray to God Himself?This is what concerns me. How many Catholics have pushed Christ to the rear?
Jesus is everything, and Mary and all others are nothing in salvation!Why doesn't the bible mention this role? Seems that role is Jesus'. Read Romans 5. Why do catholics brush by Jesus like Hes a leper and make a B line to mary? Scripture is clear JESUS undid what Adam did.
Jesus is called second Adam. and mary NOT called second eve!The bible isn't silent on who did the undoing here. You ascribe it to Mary undoing what eve did and then call her the new eve. The BIBLE in Romans 5 ascribes this action to Jesus, comparing Him to Adam. And Jesus is called the last Adam. Your poor out of touch example of the trinity has nothing to do with what we are talking about. It has nothing to do with what name is or isn't in the bible. It has to do with an action. You suggest Mary did something the bible never even hints that she did. However, the bible isn't silent on who did this thing, and it's not Mary. It's Jesus. So yes, you're stripping something away from Him and handing it to a mere human. It's disgraceful.
Mary of Rome seems to be same as heavenly Mother of the Mormon Church!God used Mary to humiliate Satan. Mary humbled herself under the mighty hand of God and now God has exalted her in due time. Mary is now queen of heaven and a powerful intercessor for us. It is sad that Christians reject the role God has given her for us.
Mary is the mother of the King of Heaven.Mary of Rome seems to be same as heavenly Mother of the Mormon Church!
and make sure you follow Mt 6:6Why pray to a mere creature when we are to pray to God Himself?
What concerns me is you haven't asked a relevant question yet. Everything youre asking is in my posts. But you continue to ask.This is what concerns me. How many Catholics have pushed Christ to the rear?
God used Mary to humiliate Satan. Mary humbled herself under the mighty hand of God and now God has exalted her in due time. Mary is now queen of heaven and a powerful intercessor for us. It is sad that Christians reject the role God has given her for us.
Proof?God used Mary to humiliate Satan.
Proof?and now God has exalted her in due time.
Proof?Mary is now queen of heaven
Proof?and a powerful intercessor for us.
So far no catholic has been able to show us any role she has other than the one in your minds. Because its not in the bible.It is sad that Christians reject the role God has given her for us.
Did the King of Heaven exist without a mother?Mary is the mother of the King of Heaven.
Quite relevant... you 🎨🖌️ a false narrative .... but why? 🤔What concerns me is you haven't asked a relevant question yet.
Please point out my false narrative.Quite relevant... you 🎨🖌️ a false narrative .... but why? 🤔
813, [826]Please point out my false narrative.