Adam was androgenous when created having both a male and female nature until divided. So if angels were created androgenous too but gave up their male divine nature to become human then their lust for the female human was unnatural and unseemly,I disagree. It's talking about human men.
Rom 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
If it was about the angels of Genesis 6, verse 26 makes no sense:
Rom 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
None of it makes sense without the proper historical and cultural context.
That is my point, you dont know the truth and the few glancing references to homosexuality in the New Testament are not enough to take a dogmatic stance. Based on the golden rule there is no reason for christianity to oppose life-long commitment between two same-sex humans.I will stick with the Bible.
Right. A man with a woman.
No it can't.
Men are to marry women.
The child won't know right from wrong.
No there can't. It's an abomination to God.
Christians are to do no harm, but we're also supposed to stand for the truth.
If you're a homosexual, it won't be easy, but deliverance is possible.