Since Waite is obviously wrong, only a person with an unscholarly agenda would use those words as the basis of claiming emendations to the Masoretic Text.
You jump to a bogus, unscholarly, wrong conclusion.
It is not at all "unscholarly" to apply justly the claims and assertions of the leading "scholar" [D. A. Waite] for the KJV-only side. Waite's book Defending the KJB was one of the main KJV-only books which Dr. Price was answering.
Perhaps you cannot answer the scholarship of James D. Price which may explain why you try to smear him as supposedly being "unscholarly".