I agree 100%. But it can be fun speculating.There‘s a saying I read once on another Christian forum, “Where the Bible doesn’t speak, neither should we.” So, regardless which side of this we fall on, it’s not a hill worth dying on, as we cannot know with 100% certainty he was or wasn’t there. It seems he was as it says she ate and then gave to him. So, it appears he was there, but it could be she ate and then went and gave to him. I just don’t know which is true. I believe he was there, but realize I don’t know with 100% certainty he was.