Your answer is unclear.These are good questions, but I’d say no to the first and after He rose from the dead to the second.
I think mediator is a misunderstood word in the Bible, which is strange seeing it is easily understood in the world.All of your commentators you post would disagree with you.
Here is what they call God's active human nature....
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
A note for you, some calvinists here try to pressure people to stop posting who are not Calvinist nor Arminian. But the forum is not called Calvinists and Arminians. This forum is about the two religeous concepts and is open for anyone to discuss them, even in reference to their own beliefs,No, not a unitarian.
They do not believe Jesus is God.
I believe Jesus was MADE God after his God raised him from the dead(via the Col 2:9 effect on his resurrected human spirit body).
Incarnationists teach Jesus was a microscopic God per His origin in Mary.
We are merely 33 years apart.
Jesus taught God was inside him.
We need to break free from the RCC incarnation doctrine.
And that is what makes forums so great.A note for you, some calvinists here try to pressure people to stop posting who are not Calvinist nor Arminian. But the forum is not called Calvinists and Arminians. This forum is about the two religeous concepts and is open for anyone to discuss them, even in reference to their own beliefs,
The man Jesus was the conduit. So on one had you can say, as the Bible does, He did miracles. But on the other hand you can say, as the Bible does, the Father did the miracles thru Him. Both, when understood properly, are trueJesus said "the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works..."
Did Jesus do the divine works or did his inner Father?
The word "prophecy" does have a couple meanings/uses.No, read Psalm 2 and 22. Jesus is there as a human in present tense.
I figured you knew that.
I figured you already knew that God witnesses future event, not predicts them.
I don't say that the Trinity consists of Human Personhood. But I deny Jesus is not a Human person. Nothing can be introduced into the Trinity. If you say Jesus Incarnate has always been the Second Person in the Trinity, then the Human Nature is a part of the Trinity; though you exclude the Human Personhood from the Trinity...It means Christ's human nature doesn't have its own human person in the hypostatic union but has the divine person the Logos.
Humans are persons...No, I mean define personless which will in turn shed light on what it actually means. Your above is merely reflective of your philosophical depiction, it isn't following your "personless human nature" phrase.
So, again, define personless.