Wrong again and as usual, Nathan.
First of all, your first sentence is totally wrong in the reference. It is LUKE 1:31.
Secondly, it is nothing less than an open, blatant, and deliberate falsehood on your part to say I have twisted anything. The posting history here shows that I have not done that in the slightest.
Thirdly, it is simply irrefutable fact that He had the name "Jesus" before He was conceived. That's what Luke 1:31 is saying, and the proof of this is by the angel's use of the future tense in the message to Mary.
"You will conceive and have a son"
That's speaking in future tense, Nathan.
Future tense means it hasn't happened yet. She hadn't conceived yet.
Because the angel would not have spoken of her conceiving in future tense if that had already happened.
This shows and proves that what the angel says is before conception.
"You will call him 'Jesus'." That's speaking in future tense also.
From this, it is very, very easy to see and understand that the name "Jesus" was given right then and there, at that moment.
That means He had the name "Jesus" not only BEFORE He was born; He had the name "Jesus" BEFORE HE WAS EVEN CONCEIVED.
That is the biblical record of Luke 1:31.
Any honest reader very, very easily sees and understand this.
It is truly pitiful (and actually worse) that your posts do not reflect the ability to read the verse honestly.
But - This is what it means and is to be a JW.