Jewjitzu
Well-known member
Tanakh doesn't say so. That's all that matters.But GOD's inspired scriptures in Matt.24:29-30 & Acts 1:11 does! All Scriptures on the SAME topic must be used to get the COMPLETE picture! Case closed!
Tanakh doesn't say so. That's all that matters.But GOD's inspired scriptures in Matt.24:29-30 & Acts 1:11 does! All Scriptures on the SAME topic must be used to get the COMPLETE picture! Case closed!
FYI, what you said ( man's word ) will NEVER Trump GOD's Word in His inspired scriptures that I posted! Thus case closed on your say so!As I said, the Messiah hasn't arrived nor has 2 comings.
FYI Tanakh ONLY contains GOD's OT scriptures! The NT scriptures are also GOD's inspired say so! Thus case closed on your WRONG say so ( Man's word ) that only the Tanakh has GOD's inspired say so!Tanakh doesn't say so. That's all that matters.
Find me where Tanakh says Messiah has 2 comings.FYI, what you said ( man's word ) will NEVER Trump GOD's Word in His inspired scriptures that I posted! Thus case closed on your say so!
The original and only Testament.FYI Tanakh ONLY contains GOD's OT scriptures!
The null Testament is worthless.The NT scriptures are also GOD's inspired say so! Thus case closed on your WRONG say so ( Man's word ) that only the Tanakh has GOD's inspired say so!
There is also nothing about their literal lifespan of 120 years. Calculate and see through Genesis. You will also not find this literally applicable to all mankind anywhere in scriptures. Besides, without the NT, one can never understand what YHWH meant in Gen 6:3. I rest my case.More likely yours did.
And that's the problem. A bias towards seeing what they want to see.
So what?
Again, there's nothing at all in context related to the Jubilee years. It's made up.
So says the unbeliever ( man's word as opposed to GOD's word in those inspired scriptures that I posted )! Case closed!The original and only Testament.
The null Testament is worthless.
Don't need to since GOD's inspired Word in the NT tells us in Matt.24:29-30 & Acts 1:11! But if you want to really know FYI it is in Zech.14:4-16 for His 2nd coming since the Jews of Judaism had Him cut off ( crucified ) at His 1st coming in Dan.9:24-25 due to their unbelief! Thus at the END of the still future Dan.9:27 , His feet will touch down upon the Mt. of Olives causing it to split as per Zech.14:4! Both OT & NT complement each other on those Facts! Case closed!Find me where Tanakh says Messiah has 2 comings.
I said nothing that it is the lifespan of man. Most likely, it is the time left before the flood occurred.There is also nothing about their literal lifespan of 120 years. Calculate and see through Genesis. You will also not find this literally applicable to all mankind anywhere in scriptures.
Your Jubilee years isn't supported in the context. I rest my case.Besides, without the NT, one can never understand what YHWH meant in Gen 6:3. I rest my case.
Null Testament is still worthless. Even the original Nazarenes said so in Eusebius EH.So says the unbeliever ( man's word as opposed to GOD's word in those inspired scriptures that I posted )! Case closed!
You still don't get it. Tanakh doesn't discuss two comings of Messiah. You're making up stuff above.Don't need to since GOD's inspired Word in the NT tells us in Matt.24:29-30 & Acts 1:11! But if you want to really know FYI it is in Zech.14:4-16 for His 2nd coming since the Jews of Judaism had Him cut off ( crucified ) at His 1st coming in Dan.9:24-25 due to their unbelief! Thus at the END of the still future Dan.9:27 , His feet will touch down upon the Mt. of Olives causing it to split as per Zech.14:4! Both OT & NT complement each other on those Facts! Case closed!
It is GOD inspired, thus NOT null as you WRONGFULLY say ( man's word as Opposed to GOD's word in those posted NT scriptures!Null Testament is still worthless. Even the original Nazarenes said so in Eusebius EH.
No, you are the one making up your WRONG say so that contradicts the scriptures ( GOD Word ) that I posted! The posted scriptures Trump your say so! Case closed!You still don't get it. Tanakh doesn't discuss two comings of Messiah. You're making up stuff above.
It's null and a fraud.It is GOD inspired, thus NOT null as you WRONGFULLY say ( man's word as Opposed to GOD's word in those posted NT scriptures!
You didn't show where two comings of Messiah are prophesied. You assumed and read into passages in the Tanakh.No, you are the one making up your WRONG say so that contradicts the scriptures ( GOD Word ) that I posted! The posted scriptures Trump your say so! Case closed!
Once again it is just your WRONG say so ( Man's word ) as OPPOSED to GOD's say so in His inspired scriptures that I posted! You'll see just how WRONG you are on judgment day and it will then be Too Late for your free gift of salvation! Case closed!It's null and a fraud.
You didn't show where two comings of Messiah are prophesied. You assumed and read into passages in the Tanakh.
WRONG again, I showed it in both the OT ( Dan.9:24-26 for 1st coming & Zech.14:4-16 - 2nd coming ) & NT ( Acts 1:11 - 2nd coming )! Your say so ( man's word ) remains rebuked by those posted scriptures as per 2 Tim.3:16! Case closed!You didn't show where two comings of Messiah are prophesied. You assumed and read into passages in the Tanakh.
Do you believe the Messiah came and that He is Jesus ? yes or noYou didn't show where two comings of Messiah are prophesied. You assumed and read into passages in the Tanakh.
It's still null and void.Once again it is just your WRONG say so ( Man's word ) as OPPOSED to GOD's say so in His inspired scriptures that I posted! You'll see just how WRONG you are on judgment day and it will then be Too Late for your free gift of salvation! Case closed!
No.Do you believe the Messiah came and that He is Jesus ? yes or no