Jewjitzu
Well-known member
God has an image, but it isn't physical, Gen 1:27-28, Exodus 34:6-7.that another ERROR no Image creates anything, so try again
God has an image, but it isn't physical, Gen 1:27-28, Exodus 34:6-7.that another ERROR no Image creates anything, so try again
He spoke to creation. And since nothing in creation has His image as man does, He didn't mention His image in their creation, Gen 1:1-25.God spoke of HIMSELF, now answer the question above,
another ERROR, God is invisible, so that LIE want work.God has an image, but it isn't physical, Gen 1:27-28, Exodus 34:6-7.
another ERROR, when God said LET ..... US, or when he said, LET there be, let is a conditional on what he, he, he, want done. now again ... your last chance who is the the US and the OUR in verse 26?He spoke to creation. And since nothing in creation has His image as man does, He didn't mention His image in their creation.
I didn't say God's image is visible, otherwise your idea of god is created.another ERROR, God is invisible, so that LIE want work.
I've answered. Let is conditional? I think you mean "if".another ERROR, when God said LET ..... US, or when he said, LET there be, let is a conditional on what he, he, he, want done. now again ... your last chance who is the the US and the OUR in verse 26?
Bye sushi ? man.
those are nothing but excuses. if an IMAGE is not visible then it's NOT AN IMAGE. how dumb can one be. your last chance is expired. the reason you cannot answer is because of this,I didn't say God's image is visible, otherwise your idea of god is created.
I've answered. Let is conditional? I think you mean "if".
that is nothing but Greek Mythology. LOL, LOL, LOL. the creative elements? LOL, LOL, God is the ONLY CREATOR, and he's no element.God spoke to the creative elements in creating man like He did in the rest of creation, Gen 1:1-25.
it did, read the context.... LOL, reproved again....... YIKESThe NT says God is the only and invisible and immortal. That wouldn't apply to Jesus.
I don't know... how dumb are you?those are nothing but excuses. if an IMAGE is not visible then it's NOT AN IMAGE. how dumb can one be. your last chance is expired. the reason you cannot answer is because of this,
No, Greek mythology would have you believe that gods mate with females and produce offspring like in a virgin birth.that is nothing but Greek Mythology. LOL, LOL, LOL. the creative elements? LOL, LOL, God is the ONLY CREATOR, and he's no element.
Not quite.you have been reproved.
I love sushi ? ?. I eat it up.
Jesus isn't invisible.it did, read the context.... LOL, reproved again....... YIKES
#1. U don't even KNOW who created anything.I don't know... how dumb are you?
No, Greek mythology would have you believe that gods mate with females and produce offspring like in a virgin birth.
Not quite.
I love sushi ? ?. I eat it up.
to show how dumb, and stupid that statement is, Jesus the Christ is not INVISIBLE, but Jesus is ........ lol, lol, l.ol, Oh my God a double D.Jesus isn't invisible.
So, you believe in Greek Mythology and created physical gods. Got it.#1. U don't even KNOW who created anything.
#2. U Don't have no clue who the US and the Our are in Genesis 1:26.
#3. U don't know that an Invisible source cannot produce a IMAGE. only can MANIFEST in one, Oh how stupid one is to conjure up that
other words U don't know NOTHING. ........... nothing from nothing leaves NOTHING. so see ya.
so from now on NOTHING, talk to the Hand..... ?
Rotfl... Jesus didn't exist until after his birth.to show how dumb, and stupid that statement is, Jesus the Christ is not INVISIBLE, but Jesus is ........ lol, lol, l.ol, Oh my God a double D.
u have no clue .... do U to what I just said........ because U are IGNORANT to the Word of God.
FYI, You COMPLETELY missed the CONTEXTUAL point of Luke 1:34-35! Mary asked Gabriel ( the angel that God sent to tell her that news ), how she could be pregnant when she was a Virgin and had NO sexual relation with any man as of yet! Thus God the Holy Spirit came upon her and the power of the most High ( God the Father ) caused that "flesh" ( John 1:14 ) of God the Word of John 1:1 to be formed in her womb as Matt.1:20 & Luke 1:26-35 tells us! FYI, I checked the OT ( your so called Tanakh ) and it ( Isaiah 9:6 ) CLEARLY agrees with John 1:1+14 in conjunction with Matt.1:20 & Luke 1:26-35, as it CLEARLY calls that Child ( Jesus Christ - your Messiah that you do not believe is your promised Messiah in Dan.9:25-26 ) to be born " Mighty God " and " Everlasting Father "! Even the OT in ( Psalm 22:16 ) tells of that cut off ( Dan.9:26 ) by crucifixion ( Pierced hands & feet with nails to the cross etc. )! And yes the divided His garments by casting lots ( Psalm 22:18 - OT in conjunction with Luke 23:24 & John 19:23-24 - NT! Case closed!Rotfl... if you've bothered checking the rest of Tanakh, you'll see anyone from the womb is created and isn't God.
You'll also see that God's spirit rests on people never implying pregnancy.
Rotfl...
FYI, GOD is out side of Time and nonphysical till John 1:14 happened to God the Word of John 1:1! Thus Jesus the God-Man ( John 1:1+14 ) is the Exact Image of the invisible GOD as per Col.1:15 ------------------V27 says His image, not a plural. As I showed before, God spoke to the creative elements as He did in Gen 1:1-25. The physical image is from creation, the spiritual image is from God. It's pretty simple.
Otherwise, you're saying your god are gods. Too bad.
Yep, case is closed, unless you're an idolator.
Yep, she was going to get pregnant by her husband via normal relations. That's what married people do.FYI, You COMPLETELY missed the CONTEXTUAL point of Luke 1:34-35! Mary asked Gabriel ( the angel that God sent to tell her that news ), how she could be pregnant when she was a Virgin and had NO sexual relation with any man as of yet!
Yep, espikiazo, come upon, doesn't mean impregnate, and is no different than the spirit received by prophets, and they're not pregnant.Thus God the Holy Spirit came upon her and the power of the most High ( God the Father ) caused that "flesh" ( John 1:14 ) of God the Word of John 1:1 to be formed in her womb as Matt.1:20 & Luke 1:26-35 tells us! FYI,
Jesus died and wasn't everlasting. BTW, he wasn't Mighty God either as he was less than All Powerful, Omniscient, etc., in the flesh as attested to in Phil 2 and the rest of the NT.I checked the OT ( your so called Tanakh ) and it ( Isaiah 9:6 ) CLEARLY agrees with John 1:1+14 in conjunction with Matt.1:20 & Luke 1:26-35, as it CLEARLY calls that Child ( Jesus Christ - your Messiah that you do not believe is your promised Messiah in Dan.9:25-26 ) to be born " Mighty God " and " Everlasting Father "!
Yep, this Psalm is of David. The Psalm acknowledges the central person isnt God. V16 is mistranslated in your bibles and should be lions around hands and feet.Even the OT in ( Psalm 22:16 ) tells of
Yep, you've misapplied everything to Jesus.that cut off ( Dan.9:26 ) by crucifixion ( Pierced hands & feet with nails to the cross etc. )! And yes the divided His garments by casting lots ( Psalm 22:18 - OT in conjunction with Luke 23:24 & John 19:23-24 - NT! Case closed!
Well, God's spoken words resulted in the same manifestation in the rest of creation. Jesus is nothing special. Only the Father is credited with creation in Tanakh.FYI, GOD is out side of Time and nonphysical till John 1:14 happened to God the Word of John 1:1!
Tanakh doesn't say this at all.Thus Jesus the God-Man ( John 1:1+14 ) is the Exact Image of the invisible GOD as per Col.1:15 ------------------
Colossians 1:15
The Supremacy of the Son of God
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. ----------------------------- Thus we are created in GOD's image of God the Son ( Jesus Christ ) !
They are gods and not the God our fathers knew and are to be rejected.And again, my GOD is not a god or gods, He is a Trinity ( FSHS - Matt.28:19 ),
Yep, you prove my point. God's image isn't physical and all men are created in that image. Jesus is nothing special.which is why they are the " US & Our " that the Father ( included in that US & Our said in Gen.1:26! The " US & Our " ( FSHS ) is who created Adam in Gen.1:26!
The Father would NOT have said " US & Our " in Gen.1:26 if He alone ( and not God the Word & God the Holy Spirit also ) was to create Adam in their ( FSHS ) image! He said " Us & Our "! So the NT is Spot on to say " All things were Made/Created THROUGH/BY God the Word/Son of John 1:1 in John 1:3/Col.1:16! Thus you are 100% WRONG about what the OT teaches! The US & Our ( 3 Divine Persons - FSHS of Matt.28:19 ) were all involved with creation! Case closed!Well, God's spoken words resulted in the same manifestation in the rest of creation. Jesus is nothing special. Only the Father is credited with creation in Tanakh.
Tanakh doesn't say this at all.
They are gods and not the God our fathers knew and are to be rejected.
Yep, you prove my point. God's image isn't physical and all men are created in that image. Jesus is nothing special.
Thank you!
#1 - Matt.1:20& Luke 1:32-35 says the Holy Spirit will come upon her and the power of the most High ( God the Father ) will cause her to conceive as a Virgin! That exactly why Joseph was going to privately put her away because he wrongfully though that some other human man caused her to get pregnant! Thus GOD sent an angel of the Lord to Joseph in a dream to tell him that God the Father & Holy Spirit caused the pregnancy as so stated in Matt.1:18-25 ----------------------------Yep, she was going to get pregnant by her husband via normal relations. That's what married people do.
Yep, espikiazo, come upon, doesn't mean impregnate, and is no different than the spirit received by prophets, and they're not pregnant.
Another point, Luke 2:22-24, when compared to Leviticus 12:1-8, specifically v2, shows that the woman gets pregnant, tazria, the Hebrew root for seed, sperm, and becomes unclean. I can't imagine you would think your god impregnated Mary and left her unclean, since he's supposed to be holy, but maybe you didn't think this through?
Pregnancy outside of the legal marriage between Mary and Joseph would render the child a mamzer, Deut 23:2.
Jesus died and wasn't everlasting. BTW, he wasn't Mighty God either as he was less than All Powerful, Omniscient, etc., in the flesh as attested to in Phil 2 and the rest of the NT.
Last time I checked, Jesus is always referred to as the son, never the Father, and Jesus acknowledges this fact in John 20:17, and in Mat 16:17, that he isnt God, nor the Father, and God isn't flesh and blood. It's pretty ridiculous you using Isaiah 9:6 in light of these facts.
Yep, this Psalm is of David. The Psalm acknowledges the central person isnt God. V16 is mistranslated in your bibles and should be lions around hands and feet.
Yep, you've misapplied everything to Jesus.
BTW, nothing you're to say to me is anything new that I haven't heard. Try something new.
#1 - Matt.1:20& Luke 1:32-35 says the Holy Spirit will come upon her and the power of the most High ( God the Father ) will cause her to conceive as a Virgin!
NO! The Man Jesus has NO Father.Just to clarify your Trinitarian view...
Is God the Father then the father of the man Jesus?