This was neither a personal attack, nor an attempt at decisiveness; PG, quoting the WCF, may not be technically correct using the term "Calvinism Confession", for Calvinism is a theological perspective, not a denominational statement of faith and theological understanding. But it is, pragmatically, a Calvinistic expression of what they confess as true and why they believed as they do.
I don't know how my words are considered to be not gentle. I merely asked a question and made a statement expressing something similar to what I've stated above. It is my observation and conclusion that you are side stepping the argument and evidence that PG presented by diverting to his, perhaps, poor choice of wording. If thinking that assessing one of being "disingenuous" is being harsh or not gentle then no one here can be considered gentle, for much harsher verbiage is used by those on both sides of the argument here. Any negative accusations would be considered less than "gentle", and "wokeness" will have gained another victory over honest and straightforward language.
Doug