he didn’tThat is the historical understanding backed all over both the Old and New including Jesus. It was common knowledge with 2nd temple Jews and 1st century Christians.
he didn’tThat is the historical understanding backed all over both the Old and New including Jesus. It was common knowledge with 2nd temple Jews and 1st century Christians.
Edit You got nuthing. The evidence for Mosiac authorship is all over the New and Old.he didn’t
There are a massive number of "historical understandings" which in the end turned out to be wrong.That is the historical understanding
You've just excluded yourself from reasonable discussion.backed all over both the Old and New including Jesus.
Oh the projection................You've just excluded yourself from reasonable discussion.
Really? Not by opinion and lip service.There are a massive number of "historical understandings" which in the end turned out to be wrong.
It is called evidence both for existence and authorship of Torah. It is multiple and compiled and the beliefs of history deniers is of no truth value since history deniers prefer lies to truth.You've just excluded yourself from reasonable discussion.
noYou lie. You got nuthing. The evidence for Mosiac authorship is all over the New and Old.
The law was given thru Moses is direct evidence of Mosaic authorship from GoJohn. You do not know what you are talking about.
It is dumb to reference consensus in matters related to history where written history is ignored. In fact finding all evidence is considered.no
it is a dumb thing to believe
Well let them falsify Moses and opinion does not get them there. Consensus has humans down as apes. What a joke“modern scholarly consensus rejects Mosaic authorship, and affirms that the Torah has multiple authors and that its composition took place over centuries.”
-McDermott, John J. (2002). Reading the Pentateuch: a historical introduction. Pauline Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-8091-4082-4. Retrieved 2010-10-03.
What province? Do you know what happened to Christians throughout the empire before the empire called itself “Christian?”just curious about your claims to know about history
Do you know what happened to the people that worshiped the Greco-Roman Gods after the Roman Empire became Christian?
You are doing mythology, not historyIt is dumb to reference consensus in matters related to history where written history is ignored. In fact finding all evidence is considered.
Well let them falsify Moses and opinion does not get them there. Consensus has humans down as apes. What a joke
Why, your own is less than two centuries old, and, like Darwin’s attempted theory, riddled with flaws and presumption.There are a massive number of "historical understandings" which in the end turned out to be wrong.
You’ve just proven your own anti-intellectual bigotry. You’ve joined with the anti-intellectuals of the nineteenth century who presumed that no scholarship prior to their own carried any weight or validity.You've just excluded yourself from reasonable discussion.
yesWhat province? Do you know what happened to Christians throughout the empire before the empire called itself “Christian?”
no miracles in historyDo you know the difference between primitive Christianity as described in Acts, spread only by persuasion and miracles, and the “Christianity” typified by the “Jesus wars“, the wars papal primacy, centuries later?
You have zero credentials. This proves it.You are doing mythology, not history
Weird how full of presumption you are.yes
they were one of many groups persecuted in the first couple centuries
most the story you hear about it are fiction, though
That’s your presumption. The tomb was empty. Jesus rose from the dead. Your denial is only wishful thinking, because you don’t want to be responsible for your own errors.no miracles in history
Your have no clue what I’m talking about. The Jesus wars is history in it’s vilest manifestation, when Christianity destroyed its reputation to usurp power. You don’t know history. You make no valid claim, just an expression of hopeful ignorance.that’s not history