No, it does not. Go look at the Greek word fo up.
Look at the translations
and consider where is the third heaven
Below the earth or above
up where? It is already established that is referring to something yet to come.
You miss the point
Where is it coming down from
Was that supposed to be a serious replythat is why I didn't agree with your paradise is up theory.
So you are saying that the new Jerusalem has already come down from heaven? So where is it?
When it comes down where is it coming from?
So where is the new Jerusalem that came down from heaven?
IN heaven
It has the tree of life which is in Paradice
Hello
what does that tell you about where Paradice is
Paul is talking about someone he knowsPaul is referring to a vision since he does not know if he was in the body or out of the body.
2 Corinthians 12:2–4 (KJV 1900) — 2 I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth
You are not making any sense...You said the fact that it is the future, therefore it has not happened yet. So it cannot be a fact that it came down.
Missing the entire point
If it came down where was it
Up or down
the dark between your ears
Nope you misunderstand the translations
You are assuming that Paul is equating... This puts you in a position of many different heavens...
It says the paradise of God...Is the paradise of God the same paradise that you call the underworld?
You are not very bright. The new Jerusalem does not exist yet else there would be two Jerusalems. If the new Jerusalem does not exist yet, then the paradise of God in the new Jerusalem does not exist yet.
Says the one who contradicts every major translation and is unable to arive at a rational conclusion
2 Corinthians 12:2–4 (KJV 1900) — 2 I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth
Paul's man was caught up to the third heaven
Paul's same man was caught up to Paradice
BTW your insults tell me you know you do not have a reasonable argument