john james
Member
Do you think that some Christians who are white should give up some of their power and give it to Christians who are minorities to make the level of power everyone has more equal?
What "power" are you talking about???????Do you think that some Christians who are white should give up some of their power and give it to Christians who are minorities to make the level of power everyone has more equal?
Christianity has nothing to do with it. All races should have equal "power". Period.Do you think that some Christians who are white should give up some of their power and give it to Christians who are minorities to make the level of power everyone has more equal?
Why do you think this is a Christian issue?Do you think that some Christians who are white should give up some of their power and give it to Christians who are minorities to make the level of power everyone has more equal?
How powerful is your white strawman?Do you think that some Christians who are white should give up some of their power and give it to Christians who are minorities to make the level of power everyone has more equal?
I don't see this as a zero sum game. People compete for power and positions, and that competition should be on a level playing field that can include minorities as well as white Christians. People should succeed on the basis of merit, not on the basis of what group they belong to, or who their parents are.Do you think that some Christians who are white should give up some of their power and give it to Christians who are minorities to make the level of power everyone has more equal?
Not according the Left wing elites.I don't see this as a zero sum game. People compete for power and positions, and that competition should be on a level playing field that can include minorities as well as white Christians. People should succeed on the basis of merit, not on the basis of what group they belong to, or who their parents are.
I don't see this as a zero sum game. People compete for power and positions, and that competition should be on a level playing field that can include minorities as well as white Christians. People should succeed on the basis of merit, not on the basis of what group they belong to, or who their parents are.
Do you think that some Christians who are white should give up some of their power and give it to Christians who are minorities to make the level of power everyone has more equal?
Why did they vote for an old white geezer male?I think white liberals should give up their stranglehold on power. They are very reluctant to do so. Bad liberals.
Because the other old white geezer male is utterly loathsome.Why did they vote for an old white geezer male?
Why did they vote for an old white geezer male?
Some "helpful" poll worker too Kanye's votes and moved them to Biden.They voted for the white guy, instead of man of color, orange.
These white liberals and their virtue signalling, they only fool themselves.
It's almost as bad as The Most Extensive Voter Fraud Organization they've created.
Some "helpful" poll worker too Kanye's votes and moved them to Biden.
Kayne doesn't obey the Plantation.Kayne was just confused, he forgot his blackness and this poll worker was just expressing Kayne's true inner desires that all black, brown, light brown, brown mixed with red, brown mixed with yellow people share, the progressive socialist agenda.
So, the poll worker can thusly be considered a hero.
That questions a literal pillar of human societies: the effect of wealth upon opportunity. I would humbly submit that this is a fundamentally different discussion from the one about racial effects on the same thing.Putting aside the zero sum question, people with well educated, wealthy parents will be (on average, of course: lots of exceptions) better educated and more skilled that those from disadvantaged backgrounds. So merit is often a product of accidents of ancestry. What does one do about that?
It isn't fundamentally different if the distribution of wealth re-enforces and maintains racial disparity. And it does.That questions a literal pillar of human societies: the effect of wealth upon opportunity. I would humbly submit that this is a fundamentally different discussion from the one about racial effects on the same thing.
Only indirectly, because it affects people independent of their race. Racial disparity is magnified by wealth-inequality; it is not caused by it.It isn't fundamentally different if the distribution of wealth re-enforces and maintains racial disparity.
And it does.
It isn't very indirect if you are on the receiving end of it. Whole communities are disenfranchised because of poverty, and it is very hard to get out of those communities. One cannot reduce everything to wealth inequality, but the importance of wealth in our society is enormous: it predicts education, longevity, child mortality, on and on and on, and one of the principle ways it does so in the USA is by re-enforcing racial disparities. There are a million studies on this.Only indirectly, because it affects people independent of their race. Racial disparity is magnified by wealth-inequality; it is not caused by it.
Lots of problems are magnified by wealth inequality, but reducing those problems to wealth inequality is reductionist.
There is no such thing as "racial disparity" or “racial inequality” in America. But in reality there is just more whites in the population and in a democracy the vote requires a majority rule.Do you think that some Christians who are white should give up some of their power and give it to Christians who are minorities to make the level of power everyone has more equal?