(a) Your inability to distinguish noun from title usage, as conceded by all erudite scholars, puts you in the "ignoramus" category of biblical expositors.
Ad hom
That much, as concerns the titular usage of "God", was conceded millions of posts ago. But unqualified theos with the article is exactly the same as the English word "God".
You are still playing games with words...The person reading English sees God...
nothing to see...The person reading sees God
True, Jesus did come from YHWH.
Therefore Jesus is not YHWH, your titular usage makes the Word YHWH. You already conceded that the Word is Jesus, nothing more nothing less.
There is the man Jesus, and the Jesus who sits at the right hand of God clothed with the glory of God. Although they are the same one ("person"), they are constituted differently.
You are assuming two different Jesus... there is no "they"
It is the man Jesus who sits at the right hand of God.
Mark 16:19
So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.
Luke 22:69
Hereafter shall the Son of man sit on the right hand of the power of God.
Acts 7:55
But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God,
Romans 8:34
Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.
So you're saying that in the beginning, Jesus just was a conception, a mere seed, in the mind of YHWH?
No, I am not saying any such thing... I am saying he is the beginning of the creation of God. Which you are going to deny.
Revelation 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;
Yes, but Jim Jones of the People's Temple claimed to "believe" that Jesus was the son of God, as did David Koresh, as do JWs, and all kinds of weirdoes. You have to have the right conception of Jesus. It's not good enough to just articulate "I believe that Jesus was the son of God."
Why are you surprised about that?... Confession is the base...Actions prove if the confession is true.
Luke 6
45 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh.
46 And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?
47 Whosoever cometh to me, and heareth my sayings, and doeth them, I will shew you to whom he is like:
48 He is like a man which built an house, and digged deep, and laid the foundation on a rock: and when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently upon that house, and could not shake it: for it was founded upon a rock.
49 But he that heareth, and doeth not, is like a man that without a foundation built an house upon the earth; against which the stream did beat vehemently, and immediately it fell; and the ruin of that house was great.
One evidence of faith is having the right conception of who Jesus is.
The right conception begins with confessing that Jesus is the son of God.
And if Jesus was, as he clearly is in the minds of so many unitarians, just a conception in the mind of God before he became human, then he is no different from any other man.
I cannot say what others have in their minds.
Do you credit the virgin birth?
If by credit you mean to believe, of course, I do. People perform artificial insemination, don't they? Which do you think is harder to do? Make a man from the dirt or impregnate a woman artificially?
Again, your lack of Greek is your undoing.
on the contrary your knowledge of Greek ist your undoing.
Proverbs 3:5-6
Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.
The beginning of the creation of God in Greek carries nuances, including "ruler of all creation" by virtue of having the pre-eminence over all creation.
It also means God created the one who is the beginning of creation
Similar idea to the first born.
Then who do you suppose is the beginning of creation? The firstborn of every creature?
Colossians 1:15
Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
This is not to say that the Logos was himself "created" in time.
So he was created outside of time as we know it.
Of that the bible says nothing.
Of course, it does...time as we know it began with the celestial bodies.
Genesis 1:14
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
In fact, as time itself seems to be part of creation,
We are fully informed as to when time began...
Genesis 1:14
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
all that is known is that the Logos existed outside of time ("before the world was" - John 17:5).
Because he is the beginning of creation...God created all things by him and for him...
Col 1
15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.