Does the LDS church teach that men can evolve into a God?

Bonnie

Super Member
I can't argue what impression anyone got--but I never made that comment--and I never made any comment I didn't take your "well-thought out responses seriously". That just isn't true.



Wrong. And neither do you have anything archived where I stated any such thing. That's a fabricated accusation, which has no basis in truth.

As I already stated--the point of my not taking things too seriously was directed at the affront from the posts--not the content.

What right do you have in accusing me--when you haven't even asked me for an explanation of what I meant?
Where did I accuse you of anything? I reread my post and I simply asked if the things I posted rang a bell...how is that an accusation?

Where did I accuse you of writing the part about well-thought out responses? No, I wrote that.
But I WAS a bit unclear. I meant that one COULD conclude that the "this" that is not taken seriously COULD include our well thought out responses. I apologize for not being clearer. I will change the "would" to "could". :)

But why didn't YOU ask me for an explanation for what I meant about my " taking our well thought out responses seriously"? :)

As for asking you what you meant...it seemed pretty clear to me...but since you almost never give us straightforward answers to our questions in our debates, then maybe we did not ask for an explanation because we figured we would get more of the same...that is a reasonable conclusion, is it not?

Now, back to the discussion on men evolving into gods...
 
Last edited:

brotherofJared

Well-known member
The NT was written in the first century, during the lifetime of many who were eye witnesses of Jesus Christ. That isn't "adding" to anything, but just a statement of fact.
That phrase isn't in the scriptures. That's a fact. You added it. That's a fact. The statement calls for apostles and prophets in the church and that's a fact. Regardless of when it was written, the phrase "in the first century" is simply not there.
 

Bonnie

Super Member
That phrase isn't in the scriptures. That's a fact. You added it. That's a fact. The statement calls for apostles and prophets in the church and that's a fact. Regardless of when it was written, the phrase "in the first century" is simply not there.
Where did I say the phrase WAS in the Bible? Talk about a straw man--!
 

dberrie2020

Well-known member
As for asking you what you meant...it seemed pretty clear to me...but since you almost never give us straightforward answers to our questions in our debates, then maybe we did not ask for an explanation because we figured we would get more of the same...that is a reasonable conclusion, is it not?
IMO--that's as flakey as the accusation I didn't take your well thought out responses seriously.
 

Theo1689

Well-known member
IMO--that's as flakey as the accusation I didn't take your well thought out responses seriously.

Exactly what is "taking seriously" when all you do is repost the same old three posts (which aren't about defending Mormonism, but instead attacking Christianity, which is NOT the topic of this forum), even though your posts have been answered a hundred times?

And then you never answer OUR criticisms!
Thank you for showing the entire world the bankruptcy that is "Mormonism".
 

Bonnie

Super Member
IMO--that's as flakey as the accusation I didn't take your well thought out responses seriously.
But the bolded part IS true, as the non-Mormons can attest to, and as I have proven many times on this board and the other board, from archived posts, many of them with unanswered questions. I have witnesses. Tertium, OG, Theo, Magdalena...

Is demonstrating Mormon debate tactics 1-5 in my signature a demonstration of taking us seriously?

Now, the only reason I put this thread on here was to prove to a couple of Mormons on here who denied it,that your church does teach that men supposedly can evolve into gods. I proved I was correct by linking to an article on lds.org. That is all.
 
Last edited:

dberrie2020

Well-known member
But the bolded part IS true, as the non-Mormons can attest to, and as I have proven many times on this board and the other board, from archived posts, many of them with unanswered questions. I have witnesses. Tertium, OG, Theo, Magdalena...

LOL!!!! So--gathering one's cronies around them-- is proof of --what?

Is demonstrating Mormon debate tactics 1-5 in my signature a demonstration of taking us seriously?

Another very strange approach of proving something. How are you relating your contrived tactics to proof of my not taking something seriously?

I'll add that to my classic straw man productions file.
 

Theo1689

Well-known member
LOL!!!! So--gathering one's cronies around them-- is proof of --what?

You tell us.
You're the one in a church where octagenarians meet together every April and October, sometimes more mentally challenged and unaware as Biden (eg. Hinckley).

Another very strange approach of proving something. How are you relating your contrived tactics to proof of my not taking something seriously?

Well, there was your admission on the previous boards.
And all your posts testify to it as well.
 

Bonnie

Super Member
LOL!!!! So--gathering one's cronies around them-- is proof of --what?



Another very strange approach of proving something. How are you relating your contrived tactics to proof of my not taking something seriously?

I'll add that to my classic straw man productions file.
Ever hear of witnesses?--and there are several on here who could affirm what I wrote--aren't there...and I have archived a number of posts that prove what I have written--want to see a few?

So I am not gathering CRONIES, But WITNESSES--Do you understand the difference?
 
Last edited:

Bonnie

Super Member
You tell us.
You're the one in a church where octagenarians meet together every April and October, sometimes more mentally challenged and unaware as Biden (eg. Hinckley).



Well, there was your admission on the previous boards.
And all your posts testify to it as well.
And is ignoring our answers by pretending we never answered, and repeating the same questions , a sign our posts WERE taken seriously? Not in MY book!
 
Top