You're claiming the stuff of the 9.26 galaxies...along with all of the others galaxies in the universe at one time were contained in a microscopic singularity.
But, concerning the light....perhaps the light was created in transit. Perhaps the speed of light changed. Perhaps the gravity on earth was different than the gravity way out in space and time moved slower on earth relative to deep space. But lets not forget...you're claiming the stuff of the 9.26 galaxies...along with all of the others galaxies in the universe at one time were contained in a microscopic singularity. Care to explain that? Then answer where the stuff came from.
Wrong. I haven't referred to "a microscopic singularity" and an expanding universe at all, and I'm only interested in your hypothesis that the universe is less than 6000 years old and presumably has not changed in 6000 years.
Do you have any evidence to support your hypothesis that "
perhaps light was created in transit" in the last 6000 years, whatever that means?
And do you have any evidence to support your hypothesis that "
perhaps the speed of light changed" in the last 6000 years from infinity to ~300,000 km/sec? And if so, do you have any evidence that the speed of light is still changing?
Or are they just silly obfuscations.
If the speed of light is constant, however, and
you claim that the universe is only 6000 years old and unchanged, then all the visible galaxies must be within 6000 light-years from Earth, and that the visible universe therefore has a volume of ~905 billion cubic light-years.
And since there are ~two trillion visible galaxies, then
you claim there are ~2.21 galaxies per cubic light-year and therefore ~9.26 galaxies within one light-year from Earth, and that the average spacing between stars is therefore less than four billion kilometres, given that Neptune is ~4.5 billion kilometres from Earth.
Or are the biblical creation stories just imaginative fantasies?