Harry Leggs
Super Member
Agree. It kinda sorta (presupposes) equalizes the two when there is no equalization.I object to your "bothsidesism".
The vote count for one and the fact Biden pulled ahead in the dead of the night in Dem controlled districts. Unguarded vote containers where ballots could be stuffed. There is plenty of reason to suspect vote fraud on account of the Dems who do not care about morals and where ends justify the means.Trump had been saying for years that any election he lost had to have been rigged, and he said this well in advance of elections. And so when he lost, why was it surprising he claimed fraud?
They really did not look and there is the D'Souza video 2000 mules. Authorities do not have to do their job and that is what happened here and if yuou do not know that then you have your head where the sun does not shine.You said in your OP
The simple explanation for this is that Trump had ample opportunity to present evidence of fraud. There were 60+ courtcases and multiple recounts and audits in key states. Nothing remotely was found.
I do not know what Barr said. I do know none of them will debate and are expressing opinion. They are not detached. They are partisans against Trump.All of Trump's advisors and even Bill Barr said there was no fraud on a significant scale.
Right authorities did not do their jobs and that is why Repubs will win in Nov. Too much corruption and malfeasance.A few people (maybe 6) were prosecuted for voting illegally.
So despite the great opportunity your side had to find evidence and present a case, you failed. So why is it hard to acknowledge that there was no there there?