Election Fraud

vibise said:
Garland has requested that the search warrant be made public so that we all know what they were looking for, where they thought it would be, and how they knew about the stuff they were looking for.

Trump can block that release, and would likely do that, IMO.
Click to expand...
And they will find nothing. This is the bell to Pavlov's dog. Nothing more
 
Nedsk said:
And they will find nothing. This is the bell to Pavlov's dog. Nothing more
Click to expand...
Well, they already found plenty of something. Initially they took possession of 15 boxes of stolen govt documents from Mar-a-lago, and now removed even more boxes. Those boxes contain classified documents that do not belong to Trump.
 
vibise said:
Well, they already found plenty of something. Initially they took possession of 15 boxes of stolen govt documents from Mar-a-lago, and now removed even more boxes. Those boxes contain classified documents that do not belong to Trump.
Click to expand...
That is an assumption on your part. It has not been settled in court.

But I forget that you want to bypass the court system and make rulings by fiat.
 
vibise said:
Well, they already found plenty of something. Initially they took possession of 15 boxes of stolen govt documents from Mar-a-lago, and now removed even more boxes. Those boxes contain classified documents that do not belong to Trump.
Click to expand...
Then it should be very easy to get a conviction. Want to bet that it never will happen?

Ding Ding
 
vibise said:
Well, they already found plenty of something. Initially they took possession of 15 boxes of stolen govt documents from Mar-a-lago, and now removed even more boxes. Those boxes contain classified documents that do not belong to Trump.
Click to expand...
Hey why don't you want men to have the same number of choices that women have with regards to pregnancy?
 
Crazy Ivan said:
I understand where people on both sides are coming from. What I *don't* understand is the incredulousness from folks on the left that this in any way could possibly have been a fraudulent election.
Click to expand...
Define "fraudulent election".

Is it one in which at least some fraud took place, or it is an election permeated by fraud? Somewhere in-between?

The term is intentionally vague, because it's meant to stir up emotions, rather than convey specific ideas. You're supposed to be outraged/angered by an election being fraudulent, which then is justification for dismissing any possible chance of it being legitimate/fair/legal.

Some fraud took place in the 2020 election. The same is likely true for every presidential election in American history. The problem, though, is that the amount of fraud was too small to have impacted the results in any meaningful way. We know this because fraudsters have been caught and prosecuted, as well as the fact that all states in this union have certified the results - which correspondingly were again certified in the US congress.

The left is incredulous because calling the election "fraudulent" is a misleading lie. It'd be equivalent to claiming the American food supply is contaminated with e-coli: while true on a very small scale, it in no way means the entire food supply is unfit for consumption.

This is much easier than you're trying to make it out to be...
 
mikeT said:
Define "fraudulent election".

Is it one in which at least some fraud took place, or it is an election permeated by fraud? Somewhere in-between?

The term is intentionally vague, because it's meant to stir up emotions, rather than convey specific ideas. You're supposed to be outraged/angered by an election being fraudulent, which then is justification for dismissing any possible chance of it being legitimate/fair/legal.

Some fraud took place in the 2020 election. The same is likely true for every presidential election in American history. The problem, though, is that the amount of fraud was too small to have impacted the results in any meaningful way. We know this because fraudsters have been caught and prosecuted, as well as the fact that all states in this union have certified the results - which correspondingly were again certified in the US congress.

The left is incredulous because calling the election "fraudulent" is a misleading lie. It'd be equivalent to claiming the American food supply is contaminated with e-coli: while true on a very small scale, it in no way means the entire food supply is unfit for consumption.

This is much easier than you're trying to make it out to be...
Click to expand...
This was hilarious:

www.cnn.com

It didn't take long for Meta's new chatbot to say something offensive

Meta's new chatbot can convincingly mimic how humans speak on the internet — for better and worse.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top