My assertion is the same type as Chalcedon's. As such, it requires no proof. ?How so?
Further, with your unexplained nonsense, I owe you NO explanation.
My assertion is the same type as Chalcedon's. As such, it requires no proof. ?How so?
Made it up lolHow so?
Of course you did. That's my point.Made it up lol
My assertion is the same type as Chalcedon's. As such, it requires no proof. ?
Further, with your unexplained nonsense, I owe you NO explanation.
There is no explanation for tulip it’s unbiblicalok ......
Prove it.There is no explanation for tulip it’s unbiblical
You da manok ......
You da man
It’s how one responds when their doctrines cannot be defended with scripture.Is that like a new thng?
As is your gibberish?Is that like a new thng?
Your theologyGobblygook
They respond as @Chalcedon does.It’s how one responds when their doctrines cannot be defended with scripture.
Yes I am. The text never says it's conditional.Are you saying that our election is not conditional on us being diligent in faith, virtue, knowledge, self-control, patience, godliness, kindness, and love?
Our Election is not based on our Running the Race; although we will run it for Saint James' sake...Yes I am. The text never says it's conditional.
Our confirming our election is however conditional on those things.
Our Election is not based on our Running the Race; although we will run it for Saint James' sake...